LULU vs DECK: Comparative Analysis of Apparel & Footwear Stocks Amid Cyclical Sector Trends
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Related Stocks
A Reddit post (timestamp: 2025-11-22 02:04 EST) compares
- Similar YTD declines and P/E ratios
- Divergent 5-year returns (DECK positive vs LULU negative)
- Contrasting business models: LULU (single-brand, larger market cap) vs DECK (multi-brand portfolio with lower debt claims)
The author seeks input on which stock represents a better investment opportunity.
On the day of the post (2025-11-22):
- Both stocks outperformed the Consumer Cyclical sector(+1.37% [6]):
- $LULU: +2.12% to $168.18 [0]
- $DECK: +4.48% to $85.13 (double LULU’s gain [1])
This suggests stronger investor sentiment toward DECK relative to LULU on the day.
- 5-Year Returns: DECK delivered +98.44% vs LULU’s -51.75% [4,5], indicating sustained outperformance.
- Analyst Upside: DECK’s consensus target ($113) implies a32.7% upside; LULU’s target ($175) offers only4.1% upside[4,5].
| Metric | $LULU | $DECK |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $19.08B | $12.76B |
| YTD Decline | -54.83% | -58.38% |
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 11.26x | 12.44x |
| ROE | 42.05% | 40.31% |
| Current Ratio | 2.27 | 3.07 (higher liquidity) |
| Analyst Consensus | BUY (46.4% Buy,46.4% Hold) | BUY (47.2% Buy/Hold,9.4% Sell) |
Source: [4] ($LULU Overview), [5] ($DECK Overview)
- Direct: $LULU (NASDAQ), $DECK (NYSE)
- Sector: Both operate in theConsumer Cyclicalsector (Apparel Retail/Footwear [4,5]).
- $LULU Strengths: Higher ROE, lower P/E ratio, larger scale.
- $LULU Weaknesses: Recent leadership changes (key executive exit [7]), negative long-term returns, minimal analyst upside.
- $DECK Strengths: Higher liquidity, stronger 5-year returns, significant upside, recent Stifel upgrade to Buy (Nov18 [5]).
- $DECK Weaknesses: Steeper YTD decline, slightly higher P/E ratio.
- Debt Verification: Confirm DECK’s lower debt claim (not in current data).
- Insider Transactions: Details of DECK’s SEC Form4 filings (Nov20 [8])—buys or sells?
- Leadership Impact: Will LULU’s executive exit (Celeste Burgoyne [7]) disrupt operations?
- Leadership Risk ($LULU): The exit of a 19-year key executive (Americas president [7]) may create operational uncertainty. Monitor integration of new leadership (Andre Maestrini [7]).
- Market Sentiment: Double-digit YTD declines for both stocks reflect cyclical sector concerns. Assess if declines are temporary (macro headwinds) or structural.
- Valuation vs Liquidity: DECK’s higher liquidity comes with a slightly higher P/E ratio—investors pay more for earnings.
- $LULU: Black Friday sales performance (early sales ongoing [7]) and leadership integration.
- $DECK: Insider transaction details (Form4 [8]) and Hoka brand growth (key segment [5]).
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
