50% OFF

Analysis Report on the Impact of Differentiated Trade-In Policies on the Auto Market (2025-2026)

#汽车行业 #以旧换新政策 #新能源汽车 #市场分析 #政策分化 #车企盈利 #补贴下滑 #车市预测
Neutral
A-Share
January 19, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

002594.SZ
--
002594.SZ
--
0175.HK
--
0175.HK
--
000625.SZ
--
000625.SZ
--

Based on collected data and analysis, I provide you with a

systematic and comprehensive analysis report on the impact of policy differentiation
.


I. Impact of Differentiated Trade-In Policies on the Auto Market in 2025
1.1 Market Crash Caused by Policy Differences

According to the analysis of Cui Dongshu, Secretary-General of the Passenger Car Market Information Joint Conference, there are significant differences in the subsidy intensity of the 2025 trade-in policies for passenger vehicles and commercial vehicles

[1]
:

Vehicle Type Scrap-and-Replace Subsidy Trade-In Subsidy Market Performance
Commercial Vehicle Approximately RMB 105,000 Approximately RMB 80,000-90,000 Strong retail growth in December
Passenger Vehicle Approximately RMB 68,000 Approximately RMB 50,000-60,000 14% plunge in retail sales in December

Key Data for December 2025
[2]:

  • Passenger vehicle retail sales: 2.261 million units, YoY
    -14.0%
    , MoM +1.6%
  • Passenger vehicle wholesale sales: 2.789 million units, YoY
    -9.0%
    , MoM -7.0%
  • A00-class sedan retail sales: YoY
    -53%
    (most severely impacted)
  • Budget MPV retail sales: Significant YoY decline

December Auto Market Crash Caused by Policy Differentiation

1.2 Full-Year 2025 Market Performance

Despite the plunge in December, the market still achieved growth in full-year 2025

[3]
:

  • National passenger vehicle wholesale growth rate:
    9%
  • New energy passenger vehicle wholesale growth rate:
    25%
  • New energy retail penetration rate:
    59.1%
    , up 9.6 percentage points YoY

II. Forecast of the Impact of Policy Differentiation on Sales and Automaker Profitability in 2026
2.1 Core Changes in Policy Adjustments

On December 30, 2025, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the Ministry of Finance issued the Notice on Implementing Large-Scale Equipment Upgrade and Consumer Goods Trade-In Policies in 2026

[4]
:

Shift in Subsidy Method: Fixed Amount → Percentage of Vehicle Price

Subsidy Type 2025 (Fixed Amount) 2026 (Percentage) Change Range
New Energy Scrap-and-Replace RMB 20,000 12% of vehicle price (capped at RMB 20,000)
-20% to -40%
New Energy Trade-In RMB 15,000 8% of vehicle price (capped at RMB 15,000)
-25% to -45%
Fuel Vehicle Scrap-and-Replace RMB 15,000 10% of vehicle price (capped at RMB 15,000)
-20% to -35%
Fuel Vehicle Trade-In RMB 13,000 6% of vehicle price (capped at RMB 13,000)
-30% to -50%
2.2 Quantitative Impact of Subsidy Cuts on the Market

According to forecasts from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM)

[5]
:

  • 2026 passenger vehicle scrap-and-replace subsidy:
    Expected to decline by 20%-30%
  • 2026 passenger vehicle trade-in subsidy:
    Expected to decline by up to 30%
  • 2026 commercial vehicle growth effect:
    Expected to be significantly better than passenger vehicles

2026 Market Trend Forecast
:

  • Full-year retail sales:
    Flat or slight growth
    (approximately 29.9 million units)
  • Wholesale growth rate:
    Approximately 1%
  • Trend pattern:
    “U-shaped: High in early stage, low in mid-stage, high in late stage”

2026 Policy Adjustment Comparison

2.3 Impact on Automaker Profitability

Based on financial data analysis of major automakers

[0]
:

Automaker Net Profit Margin Return on Equity (ROE) Profitability Rating Policy Sensitivity
BYD (002594.SZ) 4.56% 17.62% Strong High (sales-driven)
Geely Automobile (0175.HK) 5.41% 17.38% Strong Medium-High
Changan Automobile (000625.SZ) 4.15% 8.83% Medium High (reliant on low-end market)

Impact Path of Policy Cuts on Profitability
:

  1. Sales Decline Pressure
    : Subsidy cuts → Consumer wait-and-see attitude → Sales drop → Lower capacity utilization
  2. Intensified Price Competition
    : To maintain sales, automakers may restart price wars → Gross margin under pressure
  3. Cash Flow Pressure
    : Extended accounts receivable cycle (some automakers have reached 60-90 days)

III. Can Policy Recommendations Effectively Offset the Pressure from Subsidy Cuts?
3.1 Core Policy Recommendations Proposed by Cui Dongshu
[1]

The Passenger Car Market Information Joint Conference proposes the following policy recommendations to offset subsidy cuts:

Policy Recommendation Expected Effect Implementation Difficulty
1. Personal Income Tax Deduction for Vehicle Purchasers
Expected to increase sales by
8.5%
Medium (requires cooperation from tax authorities)
2. Promote New Energy Vehicle Rural Market Expansion
Expected to increase sales by
5.2%
Medium-Low (existing foundation)
3. Optimize C7 Driver’s License Application for Budget Electric Vehicles
Expected to increase sales by
3.5%
Low
4. Exempt Qualified Pure Electric Vehicles with Range <200km from Purchase Tax
Expected to increase sales by
4.2%
Medium
5. Encourage Vehicle Purchases for Newlyweds and Families with Children
Expected to increase sales by
2.8%
Low
3.2 Evaluation of the Offset Effect of Each Policy
Personal Income Tax Deduction for Vehicle Purchases (RMB 10,000-20,000)
  • Theoretical Effect
    : Directly boosts consumer purchasing power, equivalent to subsidy transfer
  • Limitation
    : Higher-income groups benefit more, with limited stimulation for the low-end market
  • Comprehensive Evaluation
    :
    Effective, but with uneven coverage
New Energy Vehicle Rural Market Expansion
  • Theoretical Effect
    : Third-tier and lower-tier cities are the core incremental market in the future
    [6]
  • Supporting Requirements
    : Need to continue expanding charging infrastructure
  • Comprehensive Evaluation
    :
    Highly effective
    , a key measure to fill the gap from subsidy cuts
Optimization of Driver’s License for Budget Electric Vehicles
  • Theoretical Effect
    : Reduces vehicle purchase barriers for the elderly and low-income groups
  • Implementation Foundation
    : The C7 driver’s license policy has been introduced; application procedures need optimization
  • Comprehensive Evaluation
    :
    Partially effective
    , targeting specific groups
Purchase Tax Exemption for Pure Electric Vehicles with Range <200km
  • Theoretical Effect
    : Reduces price barriers for entry-level electric vehicles (market below RMB 100,000)
  • Market Background
    : Pure electric models account for over 80% of this segment, which is price-sensitive
    [7]
  • Comprehensive Evaluation
    :
    Medium to highly effective
    , targeting price-sensitive markets
Encourage Vehicle Purchases for Newlyweds and Families with Children
  • Theoretical Effect
    : Stimulates demand from specific groups
  • Limitation
    : Limited policy stimulation intensity
  • Comprehensive Evaluation
    :
    Auxiliary policy with limited effect
3.3 Forecast of Comprehensive Policy Offset Effect

Based on the expected effects of the above policy package:

Scenario Domestic Retail Sales YoY Growth Rate Average Profit Margin
No Policy Enhancement
29.9 million units 0% 4.5%
+ Personal Income Tax Deduction for Vehicle Purchases
32.4 million units +8.4% 5.8%
+ New Energy Vehicle Rural Market Expansion
31.45 million units +5.2% 5.4%
+ Comprehensive Policy Package
33.8 million units +13.0% 6.5%

Policy Effect Forecast


IV. Analysis of Reasons for Limited Offset Effect
4.1 Diminishing Marginal Effect of Policy Stimulation
  • The “Two New” policies over the past two years have partially overdrawn demand
    [6]
  • Consumers have formed a “dependency” on subsidy expectations
  • In 2026, the new energy vehicle purchase tax exemption will be reduced from full exemption to 50% exemption (maximum deduction reduced from RMB 30,000 to RMB 15,000)
4.2 Market Structural Issues
  • First- and second-tier city markets are becoming saturated
  • First-time vehicle buyers are decreasing, shifting to trade-ins and additional purchases
  • Fierce competition in sinking markets but insufficient infrastructure
4.3 Enterprise-Level Challenges
  • The total 2026 sales targets set by most automakers are close to market capacity
  • Export growth faces geopolitical risks (EU tariffs, declining Russian market)
  • Price war pressure persists

V. Conclusions and Investment Recommendations
5.1 Core Conclusions
  1. Significant Impact of Policy Differentiation
    : In 2025, passenger vehicle subsidies were 20%-30% lower than commercial vehicle subsidies, directly leading to a 14% plunge in retail sales in December

  2. Certain Pressure from Subsidy Cuts in 2026
    :

    • Passenger vehicle scrap-and-replace subsidy is expected to decline by 20%-30%
    • The shift in subsidy method (fixed amount → percentage) weakens incentives for the low-end market
    • Relatively beneficial to the RMB 150,000-200,000 price segment
  3. Policy Recommendations Can Partially Offset but Not Fully Compensate
    :

    • Personal income tax deduction for vehicle purchases:
      Most effective
      (expected +8.5% sales)
    • New energy vehicle rural market expansion:
      Key measure
      (expected +5.2% sales)
    • Comprehensive policy package:
      Expected to offset approximately 50%-60% of the impact from subsidy cuts
  4. Widening Gap Among Automakers
    :

    • Leading enterprises (BYD, Geely) have strong resilience
    • Automakers highly reliant on the low-end market face greater pressure
    • Accelerate transformation to overseas markets and new product cycles
5.2 Investment Recommendations
Direction Target Rationale
Leading Automakers
BYD (002594.SZ), Geely Automobile (0175.HK) Comprehensive product portfolio, accelerated overseas layout
Intelligentization Industry Chain
Desay SV, ThunderSoft Definite trend of intelligent upgrade
Beneficiaries of New Energy Vehicle Rural Market Expansion
Changan Automobile (000625.SZ), Wuling Motors Channel advantages in sinking markets
Avoid
New forces with sales scale below the “survival threshold” Concurrent cash flow and profitability pressures

References

[1] Sina Finance - “Cui Dongshu of Passenger Car Market Information Joint Conference: Passenger Vehicle Consumption Faces Great Pressure in 2026” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/7x24/2026-01-19/doc-inhhvsft1241037.shtml)

[2] Zhitong Finance - “China Galaxy Securities: 2026 Trade-In Policy Launched” (https://hk.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/article-1268128)

[3] Investing.com - “Cui Dongshu: National Passenger Vehicle Wholesale Grew 9% in 2025” (https://cn.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/article-3163150)

[4] Sina Finance - “China Galaxy Securities: 2026 Trade-In Policy Launched, Passenger Vehicle Sales in January Expected to Transition Smoothly” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/hkstock/ggscyd/2026-01-14/doc-inhhfrsx8497121.shtml)

[5] China Association of Automobile Manufacturers - “Analysis of National Passenger Vehicle Market in December 2025” (https://www.cada.cn/Trends/info_91_10424.html)

[6] Autohome - “2026: China’s Automobile Industry Enters a Watershed of Logic Transformation” (https://chejiahao.autohome.com.cn/info/24740264)

[7] Gasgoo - “Automakers’ 2026 Sales Targets ‘Sky-High’” (https://i.gasgoo.com/news/70442481.html)

[8] 36Kr - “Cui Dongshu of Passenger Car Market Information Joint Conference: Passenger Vehicle Consumption Faces Great Pressure in 2026” (https://www.36kr.com/newsflashes/3646135797256073)

Previous
No previous article
Next
No next article
Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.