50% OFF

Report on the Degree of Brand Value Damage to Xibei

#brand_crisis #prepared_dishes_controversy #restaurant_industry #corporate_reputation #crisis_pr #ipo_impact #consumer_trust
Negative
A-Share
January 18, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Based on the collected data, I will systematically analyze the degree of brand value damage to Xibei.


Report on the Degree of Brand Value Damage to Xibei
I. Event Overview

On September 10, 2025, well-known KOL Luo Yonghao publicly criticized Xibei Youmian Village on Weibo, saying “Almost all dishes are prepared dishes, and they are so expensive. It’s disgusting,” triggering a severe brand crisis[1][2]. Jia Guolong, founder of Xibei, referred to this incident as “the biggest external crisis since Xibei’s establishment”[3]. This turmoil not only caused a cliff-like drop in short-term revenue, but also caused in-depth damage to brand reputation and consumer trust, and had a major impact on its 2026 IPO plan[1][2].

II. Direct Financial Impact
Cliff-like Drop in Turnover

According to data publicly disclosed by Jia Guolong himself, Xibei’s turnover suffered a direct impact after the controversy broke out[1][2]:

Time Turnover Loss
September 10 Decrease of 1 million RMB
September 11 Decrease of 1 million RMB
September 12 Estimated loss of 2-3 million RMB
Persistent Operating Loss

Latest data from January 2026 shows that since the controversy broke out in September 2025, none of Xibei’s stores have been profitable, with cumulative losses exceeding 500 million RMB as of now[4][5]. To cope with continuous losses, Xibei was forced to close 102 stores nationwide, accounting for about 30% of its more than 370 stores, affecting approximately 4,000 employees[4][5].

III. Brand Reputation Damage Assessment
Public Opinion Sentiment Data

According to public opinion monitoring data[1][6]:

  • On the day the incident broke out
    : The related discussion volume reached 590, interaction volume was nearly 20,000, negative sentiment accounted for as high as 85.87%, and the Net Sentiment Ratio (NSR) plummeted to -97%
  • During the entire incident
    : Negative sentiment accounted for nearly half of the discussion and interaction volume, with the NSR remaining in the low range of -77% to -97%
  • Public trust in Xibei
    : A severe trust crisis was evident
Collapse of Core Brand Selling Proposition

Xibei has long positioned “freshly cooked on-site” as its core selling point to attract consumers who pursue quality and health. However, the exposure of a large number of prepared dishes in kitchen live streams made consumers feel “deeply deceived”[7]. In addition, Xibei used genetically modified soybean oil without clearly informing consumers, which is suspected of violating relevant regulations, further touching on consumers’ sensitive nerves regarding food safety[7].

IV. Secondary Damage from Inappropriate PR Crisis Management

Several measures taken by Xibei in crisis response have instead exacerbated brand damage[1][3][6][7]:

Wrong Measures Negative Impacts
Strong Response and Lawsuit Threats
Triggered public opinion backlash, seen as “a big business bullying customers”
Disclosed Luo Yonghao’s Consumption Bill
Was accused of violating consumer privacy, triggering ethical disputes
Launched “Luo Yonghao Menu”
Was criticized as emotional kidnapping and marketing speculation
Flippant Language in Apology Letter
Was criticized as “an epic failure in public relations”
Sentimental Article in the Tone of a 7-Year-Old Child
Was criticized by netizens as emotional manipulation

The “2025-2026 Research Report on Influencing Factors of Corporate Reputation” released by the Institute of Media and Public Affairs of Communication University of China pointed out that some entrepreneurs have prominent shortcomings in public opinion handling capabilities, mainly reflected in three aspects: misplaced communication, misjudgment, and inappropriate decision-making[6]. Xibei’s case exactly confirms this research conclusion.

V. Potential Impact on IPO Plan

Jia Guolong clearly stated in his 2023 New Year’s address that he planned to “achieve high-quality development from 2023 to 2025, complete a high-quality IPO by 2026, and become a listed company with a market value exceeding 100 billion RMB”[2][8]. However, this “prepared dishes” incident has undoubtedly cast a shadow over Xibei’s listing path:

  • Damaged brand reputation
    : May affect investors’ confidence in the company and valuation judgments
  • Loss of consumer trust
    : Directly affects future revenue growth expectations
  • Regulatory pressure
    : Prepared dish labeling standards may lead to increased compliance costs
  • Fluctuations in financial data
    : Short-term losses may affect listing financial indicators
VI. Comprehensive Assessment of Brand Value Damage Degree
Assessment Dimension Degree of Damage Explanation
Short-term Revenue
Severe Daily loss of 2-3 million RMB, cumulative losses exceeding 500 million RMB
Consumer Trust
Extremely Severe NSR remained in the range of -77% to -97%, negative sentiment accounted for nearly half
Brand Image
Severe Core selling point collapsed, inappropriate PR response exacerbated damage
Capital Market Confidence
Moderate to Severe IPO plan cast a shadow, valuation may be affected
Long-term Development Potential
To Be Observed Depends on the effectiveness of subsequent trust repair and business adjustments
VII. Trust Repair Challenges and Suggestions

According to public opinion research data, consumers’ trust in Xibei still faces huge challenges in recovery[1][7]:

  1. Cognitive Gap on Prepared Dishes
    : There is a huge deviation between Xibei’s definition of “prepared dishes” and consumers’ general perception
  2. Transparency Requirements
    : Consumers expect clear labeling of prepared dishes and price transparency
  3. Sustained Public Opinion Pressure
    : The two parties clashed again remotely in January 2026, and the controversy continued to ferment

Xibei needs to rebuild trust from the following aspects:

  • Proactively inform consumers whether dishes use prepared dishes
  • Establish a transparent supply chain information disclosure mechanism
  • Respond to consumer questions with a sincere attitude
  • Continuously improve product quality and service levels
VIII. Conclusion

Based on comprehensive assessment, the degree of brand value damage to Xibei is

moderate to severe
. This crisis not only caused direct financial losses (cumulative losses exceeding 500 million RMB, closing 102 stores), but also caused in-depth damage to brand reputation and consumer trust. Although Xibei has taken a series of remedial measures, it still needs to make long-term efforts to fully restore brand reputation and consumer trust.

This incident also reflects the dilemma for catering enterprises in balancing standardization, scale, and consumer experience, as well as the importance of communication strategies in corporate crisis management. For Xibei, which is preparing for IPO, how to repair brand trust and rebuild consumer confidence will be a key challenge for its future development.


References

[1] Datastory Index - Public Opinion Research Report on the Controversy Between Xibei and Luo Yonghao Over “Prepared Dishes” (https://index.datastory.com.cn/article/88)

[2] Jiemian News - Xibei’s Prepared Dishes Controversy Escalates! Customer Flow Plummets with Daily Losses of 2-3 Million RMB, 2026 IPO Plan Cast in Shadow (https://m.jiemian.com/article/13344618.html)

[3] Securities Times - Luo Yonghao Responds to “Xibei Store Closures”! Jia Guolong: See You at 10! (https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/3597621.html)

[4] China.com - Jia Guolong: Request Luo Yonghao to Sincerely Apologize and Compensate for Corresponding Losses (https://news.china.com/socialgd/10000169/20260116/49171364.html)

[5] DoNews - Luo Yonghao “Slams” Jia Guolong! Catering Bosses Lean Left, the Public Leans Right (https://www.donews.com/article/detail/6130/89997.html)

[6] Southern Plus - “Corporate Public Opinion Post” 2025 Review: Top 10 Events, Four Types of Crises, Four Trends! (https://www.nfnews.com/content/16VLgxnjyr.html)

[7] DoNews - Xibei’s “Prepared Dishes” Triggers Trust Crisis, Who is Secretly Competing in the Catering Industry? (https://www.donews.com/article/detail/8215/90164.html)

[8] OFweek Weike - From Confrontation to Apology: Enlightenment from Xibei’s “Prepared Dishes” Turmoil (https://mp.ofweek.com/Internet/a056714667547)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.