Analysis of the Contradiction Between Grandpa's Farm's OEM Model and Its 'Organic' Positioning
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Based on public information,
- As of September 2025, Grandpa’s Farm sources products from 62 OEM manufacturers, of which only13 are overseas partners[1]
- It was not until October 2025 that the company completed a small production base with 3 production linesin Zengcheng, Guangzhou[2]
- By the end of Q3 2025, the company’s SKU count had reached 269, but the number of self-produced products was extremely limited
- In terms of product pricing, organic baby noodles are priced at CNY 170 per jin (500g), while regular organic noodles cost onlyCNY 23 per jin, representing a premium of up to 7 times[1]
- The overall gross margin is as high as 57.3%, comparable to that of Nongfu Spring[3]
- The brand emphasizes the high-end organic conceptof “genuine ingredients, minimal additives, and nutritious”
| Time | Problem Type | Specific Incident |
|---|---|---|
| June 2019 | Nutrient Non-compliance | The detected sodium content of two imported products was 80% lower than the labeled value[1] |
| October 2019 | Insufficient Iodine Content | The detected iodine content of infant rice flour failed to meet standards[3] |
| May 2020 | Recurring Issue | Multiple grain rice flour products were again found to have insufficient iodine content[3] |
| 2021 | Unqualified Imported Products | Belgian-produced infant rice flour was rejected by customs due to non-compliant calcium content[1] |
According to the Measures for the Administration of Organic Product Certification, the production, processing, and sales of organic products must
- Grandpa’s Farm Hawthorn Sticks: CNY 27.92 per 72g
- Hawthorn sticks under Jiye’s own brand, produced by the same OEM factory: CNY 26.9 per 308g[1]
After conversion, the
- In the first 9 months of 2025, sales and distribution expenses accounted for 36.3% of revenue[3]
- During the same period, R&D expenses accounted for only 2.2%and showed a downward trend[3]
- This means that more than one-third of the high premium paid by consumers is spent on advertising and marketing, rather than product quality improvement
- When the product was launched in 2018, the brand used “originated from the Netherlands” and “European original import” as promotional points[3]
- The product outer packaging uses a large number of English words and European and American pastoral scenes
- However, all four founders are Chinese, and the brand operation is led by a Chinese company[3]
- The prospectus discloses that the brand’s intellectual property is registered by a Dutch company fully owned by an executive director, which is essentially a “Chinese brand registered in the Netherlands”[3]
From industry practice, the OEM model itself does not necessarily contradict organic positioning, but it needs to meet the following conditions:
| Conditions | Current Situation of Grandpa’s Farm | Gap Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Strict OEM Factory Audits | Has an assessment system, but frequent historical problems | Doubts about the implementation effect of the system |
| Sound Quality Traceability System | Mainly relies on OEM factories | Insufficient independent control capabilities |
| Independent Control of Core Links | Self-built factory was only launched in October 2025 | Severe delay in timeline |
| Transparent Brand Narrative | Early “foreign brand” promotion is inconsistent with reality | Brand trust has been damaged |
There is a
-
Fragile Trust Foundation: The OEM model inherently weakens the brand’s control over the entire product process, while the “organic” positioning precisely requires consumers’ deep trust in the brand’s entire process
-
Accumulated Historical Problems: Multiple product non-compliance records have damaged the brand’s reputation, and consumers have reason to be cautious about the organic commitments under the OEM model
-
Risk of Value Deviation: The high premium mainly comes from marketing-driven rather than product differentiation, which is inconsistent with the consumer expectation of “you get what you pay for” for organic food
-
Compliance Risk Exposure: The more OEM links there are, the more difficult it is to guarantee the integrity and credibility of organic certification, leading to greater compliance risks
For investors, this contradiction means that the brand needs to significantly increase the proportion of self-owned production capacity, strengthen quality control in OEM links, and establish a more transparent and authentic brand narrative to support the long-term sustainability of its high-end organic positioning.
[1] Jiemian News - “Grandpa’s Farm Wants to Go Public, but It’s Difficult to Support the High Premium of Children’s Snacks with OEM” (https://m.jiemian.com/article/13861381.html)
[2] The Beijing News - “Infant Food Enterprise ‘Grandpa’s Farm’ Submits Listing Application to HKEX, Expands Product Lines Massively via OEM” (https://www.bjnews.com.cn/detail/1768303789168857.html)
[3] Economic Observer Network - “OEM-based ‘Grandpa’s Farm’ Enters Hong Kong Stock Market with 57.3% High Gross Margin” (http://www.eeo.com.cn/2026/0109/778146.shtml)
[4] Ministry of Justice of the People’s Republic of China - “Measures for the Administration of Organic Product Certification” (https://www.moj.gov.cn/pub/sfbgw/flfggz/flfggzbmgz/200503/t20050316_143800.html)
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
