Long-Term Impact Assessment Report on the Price War Between Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly's Weight Loss Drugs
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Related Stocks
Based on comprehensive collected data and market information, I will provide you with a systematic and comprehensive analysis report.
The GLP-1 weight loss drug market is undergoing profound structural changes. According to the latest market data, global GLP-1 drug sales have exceeded $50 billion in the first three quarters of 2025, and Goldman Sachs predicts the market size will reach $130 billion by 2030[1]. This hundred-billion-dollar super market has become the most watched track in the global pharmaceutical industry.
| Company | Product Name | Indication | Mechanism of Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novo Nordisk | Wegovy/Ozempic | Weight Loss/Glucose Lowering | GLP-1 Single-Target Agonist |
| Eli Lilly | Zepbound/Mounjaro | Weight Loss/Glucose Lowering | GIP/GLP-1 Dual-Target Agonist |
- Novo Nordisk: Starting from 2026, the monthly price of Wegovy will be reduced from $1,349 to $299 (77.8% reduction), with the oral semaglutide priced at approximately $149-$299 per month[2]
- Eli Lilly: Reduced the monthly price of Zepbound from approximately $1,300 to $245, with the new drug Orforglipron expected to be priced at no more than $50 per month (96.2% reduction)[3]
- Novo Nordisk’s NovoRyz (semaglutide weight loss version): Hospital listed price reduced by approximately 50%, with some specifications cut from RMB 2,463 to RMB 1,284[1]
- Eli Lilly’s Mufengda (tirzepatide): 4 specifications reduced by approximately 80%, cutting the 16-week treatment cost for patients from around RMB 13,000 to RMB 2,500[1]
According to market data analysis, the market shares of the two companies are undergoing a significant reversal:

| Time Period | Novo Nordisk Share | Eli Lilly Share | Others |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 72.0% | 28.0% | 0% |
| 2024 | 58.0% | 42.0% | 0% |
| 2025 | 41.7% | 57.9% | 0.6% |
| 2026 (Forecast) | 35.0% | 60.0% | 5.0% |
| 2027 (Forecast) | 30.0% | 62.0% | 8.0% |
| 2028 (Forecast) | 28.0% | 63.0% | 9.0% |
-
Efficacy Advantage: Eli Lilly’s tirzepatide demonstrated superior weight loss efficacy compared to semaglutide in the SURMOUNT-5 head-to-head clinical trial, with a significantly higher average body weight reduction percentage[3]
-
Capacity Breakthrough: In April 2025, the FDA announced the resolution of the GLP-1 drug shortage issue, and Eli Lilly’s product supply capacity has been greatly improved[3]
-
Indication Expansion: Tirzepatide has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of sleep apnea, and will cover more metabolic diseases in the future
-
Oral Formulation Leadership: Eli Lilly’s oral small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist Orforglipron is expected to be approved via the FDA’s priority review pathway in 2026
-
Patent Expiration Pressure: The core patent of semaglutide will expire in China in March 2026, after which generic drugs will enter the market on a large scale[1]
-
Product Iteration Lag: R&D progress of dual-target/three-target agonists lags behind Eli Lilly
-
Passive Pricing Strategy: After Eli Lilly took the lead in launching the price war, Novo Nordisk was forced to follow up with price cuts

| Financial Indicator | Novo Nordisk | Eli Lilly | Difference Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Capitalization | $253.9 billion | $927.9 billion | Eli Lilly leads by 3.65x |
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E) | 16.12x | 50.32x | Market has higher growth expectations for Eli Lilly |
| Gross Margin | ~82.5% | ~78.5% | Novo Nordisk is slightly higher |
| Operating Margin | 42.03% | 43.86% | Eli Lilly is slightly higher |
| Net Profit Margin | 32.88% | 30.99% | Novo Nordisk is slightly higher |
| YTD Revenue Growth | 23.5% | 79.2% | Eli Lilly has faster growth |
| 1-Year Stock Performance | -31.24% | +36.35% | Stock price trends are significantly divergent |
| Year | Novo Nordisk Gross Margin | Eli Lilly Gross Margin | Difference Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024A | 82.5% | 78.5% | +4.0pp |
| 2025E | 80.2% | 76.8% | +3.4pp |
| 2026E | 76.5% | 74.5% | +2.0pp |
| 2027E | 74.0% | 73.0% | +1.0pp |
| 2028E | 72.0% | 72.5% | -0.5pp |
-
Novo Nordisk Faces Greater Profit Margin Pressure:
- Gross margin is expected to drop from 82.5% to around 72% (a decline of approximately 10 percentage points)
- Operating margin is projected to fall from 42% to around 34%
- Main reasons: large price cut (77.8%), generic competition, patent expiration
-
Eli Lilly’s Profit Margin is Relatively Resilient:
- Gross margin is expected to drop from 78.5% to around 72.5% (a decline of approximately 6 percentage points)
- Product differentiation advantages and market share gains partially offset the impact of price cuts
- Launch of new products such as Orforglipron can maintain price competitiveness
-
“Volume for Price” Effect:
- Price reductions will significantly improve patient accessibility
- GLP-1 drug penetration is expected to increase significantly from the current 1%
- Sales volume growth is expected to partially offset losses from price declines
| Product | 2024 Q1-Q3 Revenue | 2025 Q1-Q3 Revenue | YoY Growth Rate | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wegovy (Novo Nordisk) | $11.2 billion | $15.6 billion | +39.3% | Strong Growth |
| Ozempic (Novo Nordisk) | $12.3 billion | $10.9 billion | -11.4% | Affected by Price War |
| Mounjaro (Eli Lilly) | $8.0 billion | $15.6 billion | +95.0% | Explosive Growth |
| Zepbound (Eli Lilly) | $3.0 billion | $9.3 billion | +210.0% | Ultra-High Growth |
- Combined sales in the first three quarters of 2025 reached $24.837 billion, with a gap of only approximately $1.5 billion compared to semaglutide
- Growth Drivers: Efficacy advantage, capacity release, indication expansion
- Total sales of three core products in the first three quarters of 2025 reached $26.4 billion
- Challenges: Market share loss, price pressure, patent expiration
The price war is driving the industry to shift from “innovation-driven” to “cost competition”. According to industry expert analysis[1], this shift will bring the following impacts:
- Efficiency Competition: Cost control capabilities will become core competitiveness
- Scale Effect: Companies with large production capacity will gain significant advantages
- Brand Premium: Products with differentiation advantages can still maintain price premiums
| Innovation Direction | Novo Nordisk | Eli Lilly |
|---|---|---|
| Oral Formulations | Wegovy oral tablets have been approved by the FDA | Orforglipron (expected to launch in 2026) |
| Multi-Target Agonists | CagriSema (GLP-1/amylin dual-target) | Retatrutide (triple agonist, 28.7% weight loss) |
| Indication Expansion | Cardiovascular benefit application submitted | Sleep apnea already approved |
| Muscle Protection | Muscle preservation therapy in development | Bimagrumab |
- Semaglutide’s Chinese patent will expire in March 2026
- 10 companies have submitted generic drug applications: Jiuyuan Gene, Livzon Group, Huadong Medicine, Qilu Pharmaceutical, United Laboratories, Wison Biotech, CSPC Pharmaceutical, Chengdu BETTA, Fosun Wanbang, CSPC Zhengda Tianqing[1]
- Generic drug prices are expected to be only 30-50% of the original drug
- Canadian patent expired on January 4, 2026
- European market will face generic competition from 2026 to 2027
- Eli Lilly, with dual-target differentiation advantages, will be relatively less affected by generic drugs
| Company | 5-Day Performance | 1-Month Performance | 3-Month Performance | 6-Month Performance | 1-Year Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novo Nordisk | -3.95% | +16.67% | +1.84% | -14.80% | -31.24% |
| Eli Lilly | -4.96% | -2.02% | +26.07% | +30.79% | +36.35% |
- Novo Nordisk: P/E ratio is only 16.12x, reflecting market concerns about the price war and patent expiration
- Eli Lilly: P/E ratio is as high as 50.32x, reflecting market recognition of its growth prospects and competitive position
- Novo Nordisk: Consensus target price of $47, representing a 17.7% discount to the current price[0]
- Eli Lilly: Consensus target price of $1,191, representing a 15.3% premium to the current price[0]
- Both parties maintain current pricing strategies
- Eli Lilly maintains a 55-65% market share
- Novo Nordisk’s share stabilizes at 25-35%
- Profit margins of both parties decline moderately but remain profitable
- Price war eases, pricing stabilizes
- Market demand continues to grow rapidly
- Both parties benefit from the incremental market
- Gross margin decline is lower than expected (5-7 percentage points)
- Price war escalates further
- Generic drugs enter the market on a large scale, causing prices to plummet
- Novo Nordisk’s gross margin drops below 65%
- Intensified market share competition leads to a significant increase in marketing expenses
| Risk Type | Novo Nordisk | Eli Lilly |
|---|---|---|
| Patent Risk | High (patent expiration in 2026) | Low (longer patent protection period for dual-target drugs) |
| Pricing Risk | High (main battlefield of price war) | Medium |
| Competition Risk | High (continuous share loss) | Low (leading position is stable) |
| Generic Drug Risk | High | Medium |
| Policy Risk | Medium | Medium |
-
Market Share: Eli Lilly has transformed from a follower to a leader, and is expected to maintain a 55-65% market share from 2026 to 2028; Novo Nordisk’s share is projected to drop from the current 41.7% to around 28% by 2028
-
Profit Margin: Both companies will face profit margin pressures from the price war, with Novo Nordisk being more severely affected (gross margin to decline by approximately 10 percentage points), while Eli Lilly is relatively more resilient (gross margin to decline by approximately 6 percentage points)
-
Long-Term Competitiveness:
- Eli Lilly: With product differentiation, capacity advantages, and leading oral formulations, it is expected to maintain strong profitability
- Novo Nordisk: Needs to accelerate product iteration (oral formulations, multi-target agonists) to address share loss
-
Industry Impact: The price war will drive industry reshuffling, and companies with high efficiency, low costs, and strong product differentiation will ultimately prevail
| Company | Rating | Core Logic | Risk Warning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eli Lilly | Buy on Dips |
Market leader with clear growth prospects; valuation premium is supported by performance | Unexpected escalation of price war, product safety incidents |
| Novo Nordisk | Neutral/Hold |
Faces multiple challenges; need to observe the effectiveness of product innovation and cost control | Continuous market share loss, profit margin pressure |
[1] Qianzhan Network - “Breaking! Plunging 80%, the First ‘Price War’ of 2026 Begins” (https://t.qianzhan.com/caijing/detail/260113-78598f8e.html)
[2] Zhitong Finance - “The Weight Loss Drug Landscape Shifts: Tirzepatide Cuts Price by 80%, Semaglutide Patent Countdown” (https://finance.eastmoney.com/a/202601163621815986.html)
[3] IQVIA - “Outlook for Obesity in 2026: From Consolidation to…” (https://www.iqvia.com/locations/emea/blogs/2026/01/outlook-for-obesity-in-2026)
[4] Brokerage API Data - Company financial data, market data, technical analysis data [0]
[5] Eli Lilly and Company 10-Q SEC Filing (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/59478/000005947825000254/lly-20250930.htm)
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
