Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Solvency Analysis of Teamax Technology (600410)

#solvency_analysis #debt_analysis #financial_ratios #software_industry #liquidity #capital_structure
Positive
A-Share
January 16, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

600410
--
600410
--

Based on the obtained financial data, I conducted a systematic analysis of Teamax Technology’s solvency. The detailed report is as follows:


Solvency Analysis Report of Teamax Technology (600410)
I. Overview of Core Data

Based on 2024 annual report data [0]:

Indicator Value Evaluation
Interest-bearing Debt Ratio
13.92% Low Level
Asset-Liability Ratio
30.61% Below Industry Average
Current Ratio
1.35 Relatively Healthy
Quick Ratio
1.17 Good
Cash and Cash Equivalents / Interest-bearing Debt
1.51x Sufficient Coverage

II. Assessment of Debt Repayment Pressure
1. Analysis of Interest-bearing Debt Ratio
  • The interest-bearing debt ratio of 13.92% is at a low level
    , indicating that the proportion of interest-bearing debt to owner’s equity is small
  • Compared with the software service industry’s average interest-bearing debt ratio of approximately 20-25%, Teamax Technology outperforms the industry average
  • A low interest-bearing debt ratio means that the pressure of interest expenses is controllable, and the erosion of profits is minimal
2. Short-term Solvency
  • Current Ratio of 1.35
    : Exceeds the 1.0 warning line, indicating that current assets can cover short-term debts
  • Quick Ratio of 1.17
    : Can still cover short-term liabilities after excluding inventory, indicating low inventory turnover risk
  • Short-term solvency is good, and liquidity risk is controllable
3. Long-term Solvency
  • Asset-Liability Ratio of 30.61%
    : Is at a low level in the industry (the software industry average is approximately 35-45%)
  • Owner’s equity accounts for nearly 70%, with a stable capital structure
  • Non-current assets are sufficiently backed by owner’s equity
4. Cash Coverage Capacity
  • The coverage ratio of cash and cash equivalents to interest-bearing debt reaches 1.51x
  • After adding trading financial assets, the coverage ratio reaches 2.83x
  • The safety margin for short-term debt repayment is relatively high

III. Comprehensive Conclusion

Teamax Technology’s debt repayment pressure is controllable for the following reasons:

Dimension Conclusion
Interest-bearing Debt Scale Low, the 13.92% debt ratio indicates a light debt burden
Short-term Solvency Both the current ratio of 1.35 and quick ratio of 1.17 meet the healthy standards
Capital Structure Asset-liability ratio of 30.61%, assets are mainly supported by owner’s equity
Liquidity Reserves Sufficient cash and cash-like assets to cover interest-bearing debt
Industry Comparison Multiple indicators outperform the industry average

Risk Warning:

  • Attention should be paid to the accounts receivable turnover (accounts receivable was approximately RMB 606 million in 2024)
  • The year-on-year increase in financial expenses is mainly due to the expansion of bank loan scale [0]; the future debt change trend needs to be monitored

Overall Evaluation
: Teamax Technology’s solvency is at a healthy level. Its interest-bearing debt ratio of 13.92% is in a low range, liquidity is sufficient, and there is no significant debt repayment pressure risk in the short term.


References

[0] 2024 Annual Report of Beijing Teamax Technology Co., Ltd. (https://file.finance.qq.com/finance/hs/pdf/2025/04/26/1223324852.PDF)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.