In-Depth Analysis Report on the Impact of Automotive-Grade Certification Subsidy Policies on the Competitive Landscape and Valuation of Domestic Automotive Chip Enterprises
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Related Stocks
Based on the above in-depth analysis, I will provide you with a systematic research report on the impact of automotive-grade certification subsidy policies on the competitive landscape and valuation of domestic automotive chip enterprises.
The draft for comments of “Several Policies of Guangzhou on Promoting High-Quality Development of the Integrated Circuit Industry Throughout the Chain During the 15th Five-Year Period” issued by the Guangzhou Bureau of Industry and Information Technology is a policy innovation by a local government to provide special subsidies for the automotive-grade certification link for the first time [1]. This policy precisely focuses on the weak link of the domestic automotive chip industry — automotive-grade certification, aiming to promote the development of the domestic automotive chip industry and enhance the independent controllability of automotive-grade chips [1].
Automotive-grade certification is the core threshold for domestic chips to enter the automotive supply chain, covering AEC-Q series testing standards (automotive-grade product testing), AQG series standards (automotive-grade power module reliability testing), IATF16949 standard (automotive quality management system), and ISO26262 standard (road vehicle functional safety) [1]. These certifications are not only essential conditions for products to be deployed in vehicles, but also important basis for downstream automakers and Tier 1 suppliers to adopt domestic chips [1].
| Subsidy Dimension | Details |
|---|---|
Subsidy Ratio |
No more than 30% of the actual certification expenditure |
Subsidy Cap |
Maximum of RMB 2 million per enterprise annually |
Applicable Period |
15th Five-Year Period (2026-2030) |
Covered Certifications |
AEC-Q100/101/200, ISO26262, IATF16949, AQG Series |
From the perspective of subsidy structure, the cost of a single certification is approximately RMB 0.6-1.2 million, and the total cost for an enterprise to complete a full set of certifications (4-5 items) is approximately RMB 4-5 million. The 30% subsidy can save enterprises approximately RMB 1.2-1.5 million in certification expenses [2]. Considering that the automotive-grade certification cycle is usually 12-24 months, the subsidy policy will significantly reduce the cash flow pressure and financial risks of enterprises.
The current domestic automotive chip market presents a competitive landscape of “international giants leading, domestic players catching up rapidly”. In the intelligent driving chip field, NVIDIA ranks first with a 39.8% market share, Tesla FSD accounts for 25.1% with self-developed chips, Huawei Ascend series accounts for 9.5%, and domestic enterprises such as Horizon Robotics account for approximately 8-10% in total [3].
| Supplier | 2024 | 2025E | 2026E | Competitive Advantages | Competitive Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA | 39.8% | 36% | 33% | Leading computing power/ecosystem | High cost/black box |
| Tesla | 25.1% | 26% | 26% | Vertical integration/data closed-loop | For self-use only |
| Huawei | 9.5% | 12% | 14% | Huawei ecosystem/localization | Relatively high cost |
| Horizon Robotics | 6% | 10% | 13% | Cost-effectiveness/localization | Ecosystem to be improved |
| Black Sesame Intelligence, etc. | 2% | 6% | 10% | High computing power/domestic replacement | Insufficient mass production experience |
| Tier | Enterprise Type | Typical Enterprises | Expected Annual Cost Savings | Policy Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 |
Intelligent Driving SoC Design Enterprises | Horizon Robotics, Black Sesame Intelligence | RMB 1.5-2 million | >85% |
Tier 1 |
Lidar Enterprises | RoboSense, Hesai Technology | RMB 1.2-1.8 million | >90% |
Tier 1 |
SiC Power Device Enterprises | Zhanxin Electronics, Paieng Semiconductor | RMB 1.3-1.8 million | >80% |
Tier 2 |
Automotive-Grade Sensor Enterprises | Huayi Technology, Ruizhu Technology | RMB 0.6-1 million | 70-80% |
Tier 2 |
Analog Chip Enterprises | Nasemi, Richtek | RMB 0.5-0.9 million | 65-75% |
Tier 3 |
Packaging and Testing Enterprises | TFME, JCET | RMB 0.7-1.2 million | 50-65% |
The impact of the policy on valuation follows the transmission path of “cost reduction → profit improvement → valuation increase”:
Policy Release → Certification Cost Reduction → Gross Margin Improvement → Net Profit Growth → PE Valuation Increase
│
└──→ Certification Cycle Shortening → Mass Production Acceleration → Revenue Recognition in Advance → PS Valuation Increase
| Enterprise | Current Valuation (RMB 100 million) | Current PS | Gross Margin Improvement | PS Upside | Valuation Increase Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Robotics | 560-700 | 15-20x | +2-3% | +5-10% | +5-10% |
| Black Sesame Intelligence | 50-60 | 8-10x | +2-3% | +5-8% | +10-15% |
| RoboSense | 160-200 | 12-15x | +2-4% | +5-10% | +8-12% |
| Hesai Technology | 130-150 | 15-18x | +2-3% | +5-8% | +8-10% |
| San’an Optoelectronics | 800 (Market Cap) | 6-8x | +1-2% | +2-4% | +3-5% |
- Characteristics: Not yet profitable, in critical period of mass production, high R&D investment
- Representatives: Horizon Robotics, RoboSense, Hesai Technology
- Valuation Elasticity: PS increases by 5-10%, market cap elasticity of 10-15%
- Characteristics: Already in small-scale mass production, under gross margin pressure, certification in progress
- Representatives: Black Sesame Intelligence, ECarX
- Valuation Elasticity: PS increases by 3-8%, market cap elasticity of 5-10%
- Characteristics: Mature enterprises, internal supporting, stable profitability
- Representatives: San’an Optoelectronics, BYD Semiconductor
- Valuation Elasticity: PE increases by 3-5%, market cap elasticity of 3-5%
- Recommended Targets: Horizon Robotics (IPO in progress), Black Sesame Intelligence (02533.HK)
- Investment Logic: Automotive-grade certification subsidies directly reduce R&D costs and accelerate mass production and vehicle deployment [3]
- Catalysts: AEC-Q100 certification breakthrough, mass production designation
- Recommended Targets: RoboSense (02498.HK), Hesai Technology (HSAI)
- Investment Logic: Full range of self-developed chips have passed AEC-Q certification, enjoying the superimposed effect of subsidies [6]
- Catalysts: Mass production of self-developed chips, designation for new vehicle models
- Recommended Targets: Zhanxin Electronics, Paieng Semiconductor
- Investment Logic: Popularization of 800V high-voltage platforms drives demand, and certification subsidies accelerate vehicle deployment [5]
- Catalysts: Automotive-grade products pass certification, enter supply chains of mainstream automakers
- First Trading Day After Policy Release:It is recommended to avoid during the short-term sentiment boom period
- When Enterprises Obtain Key Automotive-Grade Certifications:First buying point (relatively high margin of safety)
- When Valuation Pulls Back Below Historical Midpoint:Optimal buying timing
| Tracking Indicator | Monitoring Frequency | Core Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Automotive-Grade Certification Progress | Monthly | Precondition for products to be deployed in vehicles |
| Mass Production Designation Status | Quarterly | Driving force for revenue growth |
| Gross Margin Changes | Quarterly | Verification of subsidy policy effects |
| Market Share Changes | Semi-Annual | Evolution of competitive landscape |
- Policy details fall short of expectations or subsidy implementation is delayed
- Local fiscal pressure leads to uncertainty in subsidy disbursement
- Expectation of subsidy withdrawal
- Failure or delay in automotive-grade certification
- Technical iteration lags behind competitors
- Product performance fails to meet automakers’ requirements
- Intelligent driving penetration grows slower than expected
- Price wars among automakers compress chip procurement costs
- International giants carry out substantial price cuts for competition
- Mass production progress falls short of expectations
- High customer concentration
- Supply chain stability issues
- Current PS valuation is at a historical high
- Profit realization cycle is long
- Market sentiment fluctuations lead to significant valuation volatility
Guangzhou’s automotive-grade certification subsidy policy will have a profound impact on the domestic automotive chip industry:
The policy will push the domestic automotive chip industry into a “accelerated development” stage:
- 2025-2026:Certification acceleration period, domestic replacement advances rapidly
- 2027-2028:Mass production volume growth period, market landscape takes initial shape
- 2029-2030:Mature competition period, leading enterprises stand out
In the long run, enterprises with leading technological advantages, cost control capabilities, and customer resources will win in the competition and gain sustained market share and valuation premiums.
[1] General Office of Guangzhou Municipal People’s Government. Draft for Comments of “Several Policies of Guangzhou on Promoting High-Quality Development of the Integrated Circuit Industry Throughout the Chain During the 15th Five-Year Period”. 2025.
[2] China Electronics News. “Showing Integrated Circuit Support Policies Across the Country”. August 21, 2025.
[3] EETI Research Institute. “2025 Intelligent Driving Chips: The ‘Warring States Period’ of Old Kings and New Nobles”. 2025.
[4] Economic Observer Network. “2025 New Energy Vehicle Product Value Index (Q1)”. 2025.
[5] Weikehao. “Top 10 Annual Financing Hotspots in the Automotive Industry 2025”. 2025.
[6] IT Home. “From Technological Breakthrough to Ecological Implementation, RoboSense Embodied Intelligence Shines at CES”. January 2026.
[7] 36Kr. “Black Sesame Intelligence: The Breakthrough Path of Domestic Autonomous Driving Chips”. 2024.
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
