Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Gote Electronics' Pre-IPO Valuation Surges by RMB 2.8 Billion: Analysis of the Energy Storage BMS Industry Competition Landscape

#ipo #估值 #energy_storage #bms #高特电子 #竞争格局 #行业分析
Neutral
A-Share
January 13, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Gote Electronics' Pre-IPO Valuation Surges by RMB 2.8 Billion: Analysis of the Energy Storage BMS Industry Competition Landscape

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

300750
--
300750
--
300274
--
300274
--
688411
--
688411
--
301157
--
301157
--
002121
--
002121
--
300763
--
300763
--
Gote Electronics’ Pre-IPO Valuation Surges by RMB 2.8 Billion: Analysis of the Energy Storage BMS Industry Competition Landscape

Based on the latest public information, details regarding Gote Electronics’ IPO valuation and the energy storage BMS industry competition landscape are as follows:


I. Gote Electronics’ IPO Valuation Status

Gote Electronics’ pre-IPO valuation has experienced significant growth. Based on the prospectus and public information:

Indicator Data
Pre-IPO Valuation
Approx. RMB 4.327 billion (March 2025) [1]
Estimated IPO Valuation
Approx. RMB 3.4 billion (calculated based on RMB 850 million fundraising and 25% share issuance) [2]
Planned Fundraising Amount
RMB 850 million [1][3]
CAGR of Core Business Revenue
63.31% (2022-2024) [3]
2024 Revenue
RMB 919 million [3]
2024 Net Profit
RMB 98.4236 million [3]
Comprehensive Gross Margin
Approx. 26% [3]

Valuation Analysis:

  • In March 2025, Fujian Lvfa transferred shares to Zhonghui Ouyue at RMB 12.02 per share, corresponding to a valuation of RMB 4.327 billion [1]
  • Based on 2023 net profit excluding non-recurring gains and losses of RMB 98 million, the price-to-earnings ratio is approximately 35x [2]
  • Huasu Technology, a comparable company in the industry, currently has a dynamic price-to-earnings ratio of nearly 90x and a market capitalization of approximately RMB 3.1 billion [2]

II. Energy Storage BMS Industry Competition Landscape

According to Zhiyan Consulting and industry research data, the domestic energy storage BMS industry presents a

tripartite competition pattern
[4][5]:

1. Three Core Competitive Entities
Competitive Entity Representative Enterprises Competition Logic
Battery Enterprises with Self-developed BMS
CATL, BYD, GOTION HIGH-TECH Leveraging power battery technology accumulation to build an integrated “hardware + software + algorithm” platform [4][5]
System Integrators with Self-development Capabilities
Sungrow, HyperStrong Develop BMS products adapted to their own systems based on project delivery requirements [4][5]
Third-party Professional Manufacturers
Gote Electronics, Xieneng Technology, Kegong Electronics, Huasu Technology Focus on technological differentiation and cost optimization, achieving breakthroughs through modular design, high-precision algorithms, and bidirectional active balancing technology [4][5]
2. Market Share and Market Position

According to the 2024 White Paper on the Development of China’s New Energy Storage Industry, Gote Electronics ranked first in the 2023 Top 10 Chinese New Energy Storage BMS Enterprises list [3].

Market Characteristics:

  • Third-party professional BMS manufacturers occupy a dominant market position in the new energy storage field by leveraging multiple advantages such as technology, cost, brand, and customer resources [5]
  • Energy storage BMS products account for approximately 4%-6% of the energy storage system cost [4]
  • In 2024, the market scale of BMS in China’s new energy storage field reached approximately RMB 3.448 billion, and the supporting output value of energy storage BMS was approximately RMB 8.164 billion [4]
3. Key Listed Enterprises
Enterprise Stock Code Business Positioning
CATL 300750 Battery manufacturer with self-developed BMS
Sungrow 300274 System integrator with self-developed BMS
HyperStrong 688411 System integrator with self-developed BMS
Huasu Technology 301157 Third-party professional BMS manufacturer
Clou Electronics 002121 Comprehensive layout
Ginlong Technologies 300763 Extension of system integrator [4]

III. Industry Development Trends and Challenges
Challenges Faced
  1. Price Pressure
    : The average selling price of Gote Electronics’ energy storage BMS slave control modules dropped from RMB 349.02 per unit to RMB 315.10 per unit [3]
  2. Customer Concentration Risk
    : Business from the top five customers accounts for approximately 45% [2]
  3. Accounts Receivable Pressure
    : The company faces pressure from accounts receivable and cash flow [2]
  4. Cyclical Fluctuations
    : Fluctuations in downstream energy storage project investment directly affect orders [2]
Development Trends
  1. “Chip + Algorithm + Data” Technology Closed-loop
    : Gote Electronics has collaborated with domestic chip design enterprises to develop AFE information collection chips and active balancing chips, achieving import substitution [3]
  2. AI Empowerment
    : AI is reshaping the safety concept of energy storage systems from “passive protection” to “active early warning” [5]
  3. Localization Substitution
    : The core chips of BMS have broken the technological monopoly of foreign manufacturers [3]

IV. Valuation Rationality Assessment

Supporting Factors:

  • Leading position in the industry (ranked first in the 2023 Top 10 New Energy Storage BMS Enterprises list) [3]
  • High growth with a revenue CAGR of 63.31% [3]
  • Technological barriers: independent chip R&D, algorithm advantages [3]
  • Policy dividends: national new energy storage installed capacity target of over 180 GW by 2027 [3]

Risk Factors:

  • If the expectation of high performance growth is not met, there is a high risk of valuation bubble bursting [2]
  • Need to address fundamental issues such as accounts receivable and gross profit decline [2]
  • If the market does not meet expectations after the fundraising projects are completed, the company will face depreciation and amortization pressure [2]

Conclusion

The surge in Gote Electronics’ pre-IPO valuation reflects the market’s recognition of the energy storage BMS track and the company’s leading position. From the perspective of the industry competition landscape, third-party professional manufacturers, battery enterprises, and system integrators form a tripartite competitive pattern. Gote Electronics occupies a favorable position with its technical accumulation and market share, but attention should be paid to operational risks such as price competition, accounts receivable, and customer concentration. Investors should rationally evaluate the performance support capability behind its high valuation.


References

[1] Pedaily - “An Energy Storage IPO Emerges from Hangzhou, Zhejiang, with a Valuation of RMB 4.3 Billion” (https://news.pedaily.cn/202601/559715.shtml)

[2] Eastmoney Caifuhao - “From ‘Global Market Share Rising to 24.58% in Three Years’ to ‘System Bid Price Cut to RMB 0.63/Wh in Three Years’” (https://caifuhao.eastmoney.com/news/20260109233531458322440)

[3] National Business Daily - “Gote Electronics Sprinting for IPO: Breaking the Deadlock with BMS ‘Chipization’ to Lead the Value Leap in the Energy Storage Industry” (https://www.nbd.com.cn/articles/2026-01-09/4213652.html)

[4] Zhiyan Consulting - “2025 Research on China’s Energy Storage BMS Industry Industrial Chain, SWOT, Market Scale, Output Value, Competition Landscape and Development Trends” (https://www.chyxx.com/industry/1248816.html)

[5] Sina Finance - “Market Research and Development Trend Forecast Report of the Energy Storage BMS Industry during the 15th Five-Year Plan Period” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2025-11-10/doc-infwxhkx2975506.shtml)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.