In-Depth Analysis of the Relationship Between Pop Mart's Restocking Strategy and Secondary Market Premiums for Its Products
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Related Stocks
Based on information obtained from searches, I will conduct an in-depth analysis of Pop Mart’s restocking strategy and its impact on secondary market premiums of its products from multiple dimensions.
In 2025,
| Time | Event | Market Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Early June 2025 | LABUBU surged in popularity, with secondary market premiums reaching 10x | Scalper hype peaked |
| June 18, 2025 | Large-scale restocking across all channels during the 618 Shopping Festival, with over 1 million units sold on Tmall alone | Secondary market prices halved immediately |
| Second half of 2025 | Multiple rounds of continuous restocking | Second-hand prices fell further, with some styles dropping below the issue price |
Secondary market data shows [1][2]:
- LABUBU “High Energy Ahead” Series: Fell from 1,500-2,800 RMB before restocking to 650-800 RMB, a drop of approximately 50%
- Hidden Edition Price: Dropped from over 1,000 RMB to around 560 RMB, a decline of over 80%
- Overall Premium Multiple: Gradually returned from the previous 10x premium to a reasonable range of 1-2x
After LABUBU’s surge in popularity, Pop Mart adopted an aggressive capacity expansion strategy [3]:
| Metric | Change |
|---|---|
| Monthly plush toy production capacity | Reached over 10x the same period last year |
| Monthly production capacity of plush category in August | Exceeded 30 million units |
| Global production bases | Increased to 6 (new bases in Indonesia, Cambodia, Mexico) |
This capacity expansion allows Pop Mart to:
- Rapidly respond to explosive market demand
- Break through supply chain bottlenecks
- Effectively squeeze the secondary market price bubble
Pop Mart’s restocking strategy has evolved from the traditional “total volume control” to
| Product Type | Restocking Strategy | Objective |
|---|---|---|
Mature Hit IPs (Labubu 3.0/4.0) |
Saturated supply | Crack down on scalpers and stabilize prices |
Emerging IPs (e.g., Star Person) |
Limited, batch releases | Maintain market enthusiasm |
Collaboration Editions |
Adjust based on market feedback | Balance popularity and supply |
In addition to restocking, Pop Mart has also implemented a number of measures [3][4]:
- Purchase Limit Policy: Each ID is limited to 1-2 boxes on online channels
- Reservation System: Some overseas stores adopt a combined system of reservation numbering and on-site ticket distribution
- Points Rule Adjustment: Canceled the cash redemption mechanism for points (effective December) to crack down on scalper points arbitrage
- Verification Pilot: Some stores are testing dual verification of “facial recognition + mobile phone binding”
Reasons for high secondary market premiums for trendy toy products [2][4]:
Scarcity → Increased difficulty in purchasing → Increased investment attribute → Scalper hoarding → Further price increase → Greater scarcity
| Metric | Before Restocking | After Restocking | Change Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average second-hand price of LABUBU series | 1,500-2,800 RMB | 650-800 RMB | -50% to -70% |
| Premium multiple of hidden editions | 10-20x | 2-3x | -70% to -80% |
| Scalper participation enthusiasm | Extremely high | Significantly decreased | Some scalpers liquidated their inventory and exited the market |
| Consumer purchase success rate | <5% | Significantly improved | Returned to normal purchasing |
The restocking strategy has had differentiated impacts on different IPs [1][3]:
- LABUBU: As a hit IP, it received the largest restocking effort, resulting in the most significant price correction
- MOLLY: The unopened “Pocket Friends” series fell by 51%, and hidden editions dropped by 69%
- Hirono: Collaboration editions with singers still maintain high popularity
- CRYBABY: Remains in tight supply-demand due to strong demand
- Star Person: New products still adopt a limited release strategy, with firm prices
Pop Mart’s management clearly stated [5]:
“Our products are made for people who truly love art and enjoy fun — we are delighted to see this enthusiasm. Making this art accessible is key for us.”
“If purchases are purely for ‘profit’, this model will eventually collapse.”
The company clearly stated its objectives are:
- Sell great products, not “financial products”
- Crack down on scalpers and return to the essence of the product
- Reconstruct channel control and long-term brand value
| Objective | Implementation Path | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Restore consumer confidence | Sufficient supply + reasonable prices | Attract genuine consumers |
| Maintain brand reputation | Crack down on hype + standardize channels | Enhance brand reputation |
| Long-tail IP value | Rational premiums + continuous operation | Navigate market cycles |
| Overseas market expansion | Capacity guarantee + stable quality | Global layout |
- Overcapacity Risk: Large-scale capacity expansion may lead to inventory pressure after market enthusiasm wanes
- Scarcity Dilution: Long-term high capacity may weaken the perception of the IP’s collectible value
- Valuation Correction Pressure: After the cooling of high premiums, the capital market’s valuation logic for the company may adjust
- Overseas Market Validation: Whether the domestic success model can be replicated in new markets remains to be seen
| Dimension | Short-Term Interests | Long-Term Value |
|---|---|---|
| Supply strategy | Control supply to maintain prices (high premiums) | Sufficient supply (brand health) |
| Channel strategy | Rely on secondary market | Return to official channels |
| Pricing strategy | Premium from investment attribute | Value from consumption attribute |
| User strategy | Speculative buyers | Genuine enthusiasts |
The current trendy toy market is undergoing a profound shift [6]:
- Secondary market prices return to rationality: From speculative hype to value investment
- Change in consumer behavior: From “chasing high prices” to “purchasing on demand”
- Stable market supply: From long-term stockouts to stable supply
Pop Mart’s restocking strategy adjustment represents the transformation of the trendy toy industry from “wild growth” to “rational long-term success”. From the LABUBU case, we can see:
- Short-term growing pains are inevitable: Sharp price adjustments will cause some speculators to exit
- Long-term health is promising: A rational market is more conducive to long-term IP operation
- Differentiated strategies will continue: Mass production of mature products and limited releases of new products will become the norm
- Global layout will accelerate: Overseas markets are expected to become a new growth engine
Pop Mart’s restocking strategy has had a
- Short-term impact: Large-scale restocking directly pricked the price bubble, causing secondary market prices to halve
- Strategic intent: Crack down on scalpers through sufficient supply, restore consumer confidence, and maintain long-term brand value
- Differentiated regulation: Saturated supply for mature hit IPs and limited releases for emerging IPs to balance market enthusiasm
- Industry transformation: Represents the transformation of the trendy toy industry from “scarcity-driven” to “brand value-driven”
Although Pop Mart’s strategy adjustment has caused stock price fluctuations and sharp corrections in second-hand market prices in the short term, in the long run, this “self-pricking of the bubble” measure will help build a healthier brand ecosystem and a sustainable business model.
[1] Jiefang Daily - “From 10x Premium to Halved Price: Is Pop Mart Fading? Pricking Its Own Bubble Reveals Its “Ambitions”” (https://m.jfdaily.com/wx/detail.do?id=936466)
[2] CBNData - “Stock Price Decline, Growth Slowdown: What is Pop Mart’s Next Ace?” (https://www.cbndata.com/information/294766)
[3] Securities Times - “Impossible to Get → Some Below Issue Price! What Happened to the “Hermès of Blind Boxes”?” (https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/3568949.html)
[4] NetEase Finance - “Uncovering the Truth Behind “Pop Mart’s 50% Off Clearance”” (https://www.163.com/dy/article/KIH2VU0Q05149DTH.html)
[5] CNBC - “Fever to fatigue? Pop Mart welcomes the fall in Labubu resale prices” (https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/26/fever-to-fatigue-pop-mart-is-actually-happy-that-labubu-resale-prices-are-dropping.html)
[6] Yangcheng Evening News - “Pop Mart’s Year of the Horse New Products Sold Out Online in Seconds, Long Queues for Offline Pickup: Where is the Trendy Toy Market Heading?” (https://news.ycwb.com/ikimvkjtkb/content_53899608.htm)
[7] KrASIA - “Pop Mart pricks Labubu’s resale bubble in bid to outlast the hype” (https://kr-asia.com/pop-mart-pricks-labubus-resale-bubble-in-bid-to-outlast-the-hype)
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
