Analysis of the Decline in Office Occupancy Rate of China World Trade Center and Demand Changes in Beijing CBD
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Related Stocks
Based on data obtained from searches and market reports, I provide the following systematic analysis:
According to the 2025 Q3 Report of China World Trade Center (600007), the office building business of the company’s core asset, China World Trade Center, shows the following key indicator changes [1]:
| Indicator | Q3 2025 | Q3 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
Average Occupancy Rate |
92.3% | 93.2% | -0.9 percentage points |
Average Rent (including property management fees) |
RMB 613 per sq m per month | RMB 645 per sq m per month | -RMB 32 per sq m per month |
Leasable Area at End of Period |
205,663 sq m | - | - |
This data indicates that China World Trade Center, a landmark property in Beijing CBD, has indeed seen a dual decline in occupancy rate and rent.
According to Knight Frank’s Q3 2025 Beijing Grade A Office Building Market Report, the market conditions of the CBD area are as follows [2]:
| Indicator | Central Business District (CBD) | City-wide Average |
|---|---|---|
Vacancy Rate |
14.4% | 17.8% |
Average Rent |
RMB 250.4 per sq m per month | RMB 228.5 per sq m per month |
Stock of Grade A Office Buildings |
3.47 million sq m | 12.599 million sq m |
- The CBD’s vacancy rate of 14.4% is lower than the city-wide average (17.8%), indicating that the core location still has resilience against declines
- The city-wide vacancy rate dropped 0.6 percentage points from the previous quarter, and the market is showing signs of bottoming out and stabilizing
- Net absorption has grown for two consecutive quarters, reaching 75,597 sq m in Q3 2025
The 0.9 percentage point decline in China World Trade Center’s occupancy rate and 5.0% drop in rent
-
Impact of Tenant Structure Adjustment
- China World Trade Center mainly serves foreign-invested enterprises, financial institutions, and high-end service industries
- In recent years, foreign-invested enterprises have contracted their strategies in China, with some organizations reducing office space or relocating to lower-cost areas
- State-owned and central enterprises, guided by policies, have moved back to self-owned office buildings, exerting pressure on market-oriented leasing [2]
-
Intensified Market Competition
- Emerging business districts around the CBD (such as Lize, Tongzhou) have diverted some demand with lower rents
- The vacancy rate of Lize Business District dropped 2.6 percentage points to 22.9% this quarter, indicating a demand spillover effect [2]
-
Strategy of Exchanging Price for Volume
- China World Trade Center’s rent dropped from RMB 645 to RMB 613, a decrease of 5%
- This reflects the pragmatic strategy of the property owner to maintain occupancy rate through price reductions
The demand in Beijing CBD is undergoing
| Demand Feature | Specific Performance |
|---|---|
Industry Structure Change |
Technology, finance, and professional services have become main drivers, with the TMT sector accounting for 36% of leased transaction area [2] |
Location Preference |
Tenants show a “location-quality” linked preference (fly to quality), and high-quality properties in the core area are still favored |
Cost Orientation |
Enterprise leasing decisions are becoming more rational, with “cost reduction and efficiency improvement” as the core consideration |
Flexible Clauses |
Tenants attach more importance to flexible clauses in lease contracts to adjust strategies according to market changes |
-
It is an individual case: China World Trade Center’s occupancy rate (92.3%) is still significantly higher than the CBD average (14.4% vacancy rate = 85.6% occupancy rate), and its 0.9 percentage point decline is within the range of normal fluctuations
-
It is a microcosm: The downward trend is consistent with the overall “exchanging price for volume” market strategy of Beijing CBD, reflecting:
- Enterprise office demand is shifting to “cost-effective” options
- Traditional core areas are facing competition from emerging business districts
- Enterprise expansion has become cautious amid macroeconomic uncertainty
- CBD rents are expected to remain under pressure, but the decline is expected to narrow
- The vacancy rate may fall slightly amid slowing supply and moderate demand recovery
- Approximately 757,000 sq m of new supply is expected to enter the market, with about 409,000 sq m in the CBD [2]
- The supply peak may exert periodic pressure on the vacancy rate
- High-quality properties are enhancing their competitiveness through hardware upgrades, LEED green certification, and other measures
- Customized services, turnkey occupancy, etc., will become standard offerings from property owners
- The market will further tilt towards tenants
-
The decline in China World Trade Center’s occupancy ratedoes reflect the adjustment period that the Beijing CBD office building market is undergoing, but the extent is relatively mild (only 0.9 percentage points)
-
Demand in Beijing CBD is not contracting, but rather structurally optimizing:
- Demand from high-tech, finance, and professional services continues to be released
- Demand from traditional foreign-invested enterprises has contracted, but this has been offset by emerging industries
-
The market is in a critical stage of supply-demand rebalancing, and is expected to gradually stabilize amid slowing supply and moderate demand recovery
-
Location-quality linkagehas become a new trend, and high-quality properties in the core area still have long-term allocation value
[1] China World Trade Center 2025 Q3 Report (http://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?stockid=600007&id=11570408)
[2] Knight Frank: Beijing Grade A Office Building Market Quarterly Report Q3 2025 (https://content.knightfrank.com/research/1527/documents/zh-chs/bei-jing-xie-zi-lou-shi-chang-bao-gao-2025nian-q3-12472.pdf)
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
