Ginlix AI
50% OFF

In-Depth Analysis of the 71% Equity Freeze of Qianhai United Property & Casualty Insurance: Can Huo Jianmei Lead the Company Out of the Baoneng Group Crisis?

#insurance #property_insurance #governance_risk #solvency_crisis #equity_freeze #executive_change #baoneng_group #financial_services
Negative
A-Share
January 9, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

In-Depth Analysis of the 71% Equity Freeze of Qianhai United Property & Casualty Insurance: Can Huo Jianmei Lead the Company Out of the Baoneng Group Crisis?

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Based on the latest collected information, I will provide you with an in-depth analysis report on the equity freeze, chairperson change, and solvency issues of Qianhai United Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Ltd.


In-Depth Analysis of the 71% Equity Freeze of Qianhai United Property & Casualty Insurance: Can Huo Jianmei Lead the Company Out of the Baoneng Group Crisis?
I. Overview of Core Issues

According to the newly disclosed Q3 2025 Solvency Report and multiple public information sources, Qianhai United Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Ltd. (Xinjiang Qianhai United Property Insurance Co., Ltd.) is facing a severe situation of

multiple overlapping crises
[1][2]:

Crisis Type Specific Performance Severity
Equity Crisis
A total of 57.9% of equity has been frozen, and 20% of equity has been suspended from judicial auction twice High Risk
Solvency Crisis
Core/Comprehensive Solvency Adequacy Ratio at 120.84%, predicted to drop to 105.43% in Q4 Alert
Governance Crisis
Comprehensive risk rating has been Class C for 6 consecutive quarters, frequent executive turnover High Risk
Operating Crisis
RMB 64 million loss in Q1-Q3 2025, combined ratio as high as 228.93% Severe

II. Detailed Analysis of Equity Freeze
2.1 Panoramic View of Freeze Situation

As of Q3 2025, the proportion of frozen equity held by Qianhai P&C’s shareholders has reached

57.9%
, with details as follows[1][2]:

Shareholder Name Shareholding Ratio Frozen Ratio Freeze Period
Shenzhen Jushenghua Co., Ltd. 20% 100% Until March 2028 (6 rounds of freeze)
Shenzhen Shenyue Holding Co., Ltd. 20% 86% Until September 2026
Shenzhen Jianye Engineering Group Co., Ltd. 20% 100% Until July 2027 (3 rounds of freeze)
Kaixinheng Co., Ltd. 20% 3.5% Until December 2027
2.2 Twists and Turns in Judicial Auction

Auction Process of 20% Equity Held by Jushenghua
[2]:

  • July 2025
    : First judicial auction, starting price of RMB 30.8 million, approximately 30% discount from the appraisal price
  • Result
    : Auction process suspended due to objections to the enforcement action from a third party
  • October 9-10, 2025
    : Scheduled to restart the auction
  • Result
    : Suspended again
2.3 Root Cause of the Crisis: Debt Contagion from Baoneng Group

As the core capital platform of Baoneng Group, Jushenghua failed to settle a

RMB 2.025 billion debt dispute
with Zhongrong Life Insurance (final court ruling in September 2024), resulting in the enforcement of its assets, with Qianhai P&C’s equity bearing the brunt[1][2].


III. Background and Challenges of Huo Jianmei’s Appointment as Chairperson
3.1 Professional Background of Huo Jianmei

Huo Jianmei, an ‘airborne executive’ from Ping An Group, has rich experience in the insurance industry[2][3]:

  • Year of Birth
    : 1961, bachelor’s degree, member of the Communist Party of China
  • Work Experience
    : Long-term tenure at Ping An Group
    • Head of a department at Ping An Group
    • Head of multiple professional institutions such as Ping An Property & Casualty Insurance
    • Experience spans insurance, investment, technology and other fields
  • Tenure Start
    : Appointed as chairperson in January 2025 upon regulatory approval
3.2 Governance Dilemmas Faced

Huo Jianmei faces extremely complex challenges after taking office:

  1. Turbulence in the Executive Team

    • In May 2025, former general manager Li Gongni resigned, and Huo Jianmei served as the interim head concurrently
    • In August 2025, newly appointed deputy general manager Cao Jianjun was approved, but left office only 4 months after taking post
    • Currently, there are only 6 core executives, resulting in a fragile governance structure
  2. ‘Stains’ of Previous Chairpersons

    Chairperson Tenure Issues
    Yao Zhenhua 2016-2017 Removed from post and banned from the insurance industry for 10 years in 2017
    Huang Wei 2017-2020 Investigated in 2022, and Baoneng Group quickly distanced itself from him
    Ji Guangheng 2020-2024 ‘Special Commissioner’ of Baoneng Group
    Huo Jianmei 2025-present Airborne from Ping An Group, entrusted with the mission of reform

IV. In-Depth Analysis of Solvency
4.1 Current Indicator Levels

According to the Q3 2025 Solvency Report[1][2][3]:

Indicator Qianhai P&C Industry Average Gap
Core Solvency Adequacy Ratio 120.84% 212.9% -43%
Comprehensive Solvency Adequacy Ratio 120.84% 240.8% -50%
Comprehensive Risk Rating Class C Mainly Class A/B Non-compliant
4.2 Forecast Stress Test

The company predicts that both indicators will drop to

105.43%
in
Q4 2025
, approaching the 100% regulatory red line.

4.3 Comparison with Regulatory Standards

According to the Solvency Regulatory Rules for Insurance Companies (II)[4]:

Compliance Criteria Current Status of Qianhai P&C Judgment
Core Solvency Adequacy Ratio ≥ 50% 120.84% Compliant
Comprehensive Solvency Adequacy Ratio ≥ 100% 120.84% Compliant
Comprehensive Risk Rating ≥ Class B Class C
Non-compliant

Conclusion
: Qianhai P&C is a
non-compliant solvency company
and has been classified as a high-risk institution by regulators[5].


V. In-Depth Analysis of Operating Dilemmas
5.1 Continuous Decline in Premium Income
Year Premium Income (RMB 100 million) Year-on-Year Change
2016 0.55 -
2017 10.24 +1762%
2018 15.42 +51%
2019
22.66
+47% (peak)
2020 21.31 -6%
2021 19.39 -9%
2022 14.43 -26%
2023 15.64 +8%
2024 15.25 -2.5%
2025Q1-Q3 8.69
-26.4%

In 2025, premium income has recorded year-on-year negative growth for three consecutive quarters: -15.14%, -24.42%, -29%[1][2]

5.2 Sustained Loss Trend

Cumulative loss of RMB 751 million over 9 years
[1][2]:

Year Net Profit (RMB 100 million) Remarks
2016 +0.01 One of the only profitable years
2017 -1.33
2018 -2.21 Largest annual loss
2019 -1.30
2020 -0.72
2021 -0.18
2022 +0.23 One of the only profitable years
2023 -0.89
2024 -1.12
2025Q1-Q3 -0.64 +73% year-on-year
5.3 Out-of-Control Combined Ratio

Core operating indicators for Q1-Q3 2025[1]:

Indicator Value Normal Industry Level Problem Diagnosis
Combined Ratio
228.93%
~100% for profitability Seriously exceeded standard
Combined Expense Ratio
137.13%
~30-35% +90.91 percentage points year-on-year
Combined Loss Ratio 91.79% ~60-65% Relatively high

Core Issues
:

  • Excessively high business acquisition costs: Paying handling fees far higher than the industry average to incentivize sales channels
  • Low operational efficiency: Failure to effectively allocate fixed costs
  • Weak internal control: Inability to reduce costs under the ‘Premium Rate Compliance’ policy

VI. Connected Transactions and Accounts Receivable Crisis
6.1 Issue of Shareholder Arrears

According to the company’s announcement, shareholders and related parties have been in arrears of insurance premiums of approximately

RMB 128 million
for a long time, involving 8 Baoneng Group-related enterprises[1][2].

6.2 Typical Case: RMB 96.93 Million in Premiums Receivable
Time Node Event
December 2023 Originally scheduled to transfer to Yangzhou Baoneng Real Estate via debt restructuring
December 2024 Yangzhou Baoneng failed to fulfill its repayment obligation
2025 Debt transferred to Shenzhen Hongxing Laihua Hotel
September 2025 Completed asset restructuring (settled debt with 53 commercial shops)

Debt-settling Assets
: 100% equity of Tianjin Heruize (53 commercial shops), with an appraisal value of no less than RMB 96.94 million, has been transferred to Qianhai P&C[1][2].

6.3 Substantive Impact of Debt Restructuring

Although the restructuring resolved the book risk, it

essentially weakened the company’s financial independence
, reducing it to a ‘bearer’ of shareholders’ debts.


VII. Crisis Transmission Path of Baoneng Group
2015: Baoneng Group's 'barbarian invasion' of Vanke
    ↓
2017: Yao Zhenhua banned from insurance industry for 10 years
    ↓
2022: Huang Wei investigated, debt crisis fully erupted
    ↓
2023: Qianhai P&C started announcing connected transactions
    ↓
2024: RMB 2.025 billion debt ruling against Jushenghua
    ↓
2025: Equity freeze + auction suspension

Transmission Mechanism
:

  1. Shareholder debt crisis → Equity freeze/auction
  2. Shareholder liquidity crunch → Premium arrears
  3. Equity instability → Frequent executive turnover
  4. Governance chaos → Unsustainable business strategies
  5. Sustained losses → Decline in solvency

VIII. Multi-dimensional Paths to Restore Solvency
8.1 Short-term Measures (1-6 Months)
Measure Specific Content Expected Effect
Introduce Strategic Investors
Resolve the equity freeze issue, seek investors with no bad records and insurance experience Capital supplement + governance improvement
Accelerate Asset Disposal
Liquidate 53 commercial shops, optimize asset structure Cash flow improvement
Expense Control
Control expense ratio in line with industry standards, optimize sales channel costs Cost reduction and efficiency improvement
Cash Flow Management
Improve net cash flow from operating activities (has been negative for 3 consecutive quarters in 2025) Liquidity guarantee
8.2 Medium-term Measures (6-12 Months)
Measure Specific Content Expected Effect
Capital Supplement
Increase capital and expand shares, issue capital supplement bonds (subject to regulatory approval) Solvency improvement
Business Structure Adjustment
Exit loss-making business lines, focus on high-quality businesses Underwriting profitability improvement
Strengthen Corporate Governance
Stabilize the executive team, establish a long-term incentive mechanism Strategic continuity
Improve Comprehensive Risk Rating
Upgrade from Class C to Class B Regulatory rating improvement
8.3 Long-term Measures (1-3 Years)
Measure Specific Content Expected Effect
Complete Severance from Baoneng Group
Transfer equity to unrelated third parties, establish an independent governance system Restoration of independence
Sustainable Business Model
Refined management, differentiated competition strategy Long-term profitability
Enhance Risk Management Capability
Optimize underwriting strategy, strengthen reinsurance arrangements Risk control

IX. Industry Comparison and Positioning
9.1 Comparison of Insurers with Non-Compliant Solvency

According to Q3 2025 data[5], among 156 insurers in the entire industry, only

4 have non-compliant solvency
:

Company Type Company Name Risk Rating Reason for Non-Compliance
Property & Casualty Insurance Qianhai P&C Class C Corporate governance risk
Property & Casualty Insurance Asia Pacific P&C Class C Corporate governance risk
Property & Casualty Insurance Anhua Agricultural Insurance Class C Corporate governance risk
Life Insurance Huahui Life Insurance Class C Corporate governance risk
9.2 Lessons from Hua’an P&C’s ‘Delisting from Risk List’

Hua’an Property & Casualty Insurance successfully upgraded from Class C to Class B in Q3 2025, and its experience is worth referencing[5]:

  • Established a working group for turning losses into profits and risk resolution
  • Adhered to problem-oriented and bottom-line thinking
  • Explored refined management, and clarified management responsibilities at all levels
  • Optimized business structure to enhance underwriting profitability
  • Implemented differentiated development of branches with ‘one policy per branch’

X. Risk Assessment and Outlook
10.1 Main Risks
Risk Type Specific Content Risk Level
Uncertainty of Equity Auction
Successful auction of Jushenghua’s equity may introduce new shareholders High
Sustained Loss Risk
Expected loss of over RMB 80 million in 2025 High
Regulatory Risk
Continuous Class C rating may lead to stricter regulatory measures High
Liquidity Risk
Premium decline coupled with high expenses, putting pressure on cash flow High
Personnel Risk
Frequent executive changes make it difficult to sustain strategies High
10.2 Positive Factors
Factor Potential Impact
Professional background of Huo Jianmei Experience from Ping An Group may bring professional reforms
Possible marginal improvement in expense ratio Strengthened control after the new management took office
Completion of asset restructuring Historical legacy issues have been resolved
Favorable regulatory policies Regulators have a clear supportive attitude towards the insurance industry
10.3 Core Conclusion

Qianhai P&C is facing not only a

solvency issue
, but also a
governance capability crisis
. Against the backdrop of Baoneng Group’s debt crisis, the company needs to carry out comprehensive reforms from three dimensions:
equity structure, executive team, and business strategy
.

Although the 120% solvency adequacy ratio is above the 100% regulatory red line, it is significantly lower than the industry average (only 56% of the average), and is predicted to drop to the dangerous edge of 105.43% in Q4.

Restoring solvency requires simultaneously introducing strategic investors and achieving business transformation
, otherwise it may face more severe regulatory measures, even affecting its business qualifications.


References

[1] Sina Finance - ‘Qianhai P&C’s ‘Tough Journey’: Amid RMB 63.85 Million Loss and 228.93% Combined Ratio’ (https://finance.sina.com.cn/money/insurance/bxyx/2026-01-06/doc-inhfiqwt1494875.shtml)

[2] Sina Finance - ‘Deputy General Manager Cao Jianjun Resigns After 4 Months in Office, Qianhai P&C Still Trapped in ‘Mist’’ (https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/relnews/cn/2026-01-07/doc-inhfpfxi7221738.shtml)

[3] Eastmoney - ‘Another Executive Change at Qianhai P&C: Cao Jianjun Leaves After 4 Months, Corporate Governance Dilemma Persists’ (https://caifuhao.eastmoney.com/news/20260107163048813451620)

[4] Xinhua News - ‘Latest Solvency Scan of 156 Insurers: 4 Insurance Companies’ Solvency ‘Red Alert’’ (http://www.news.cn/money/20251110/200d846648d649049f3d6a56b286af3d/c.html)

[5] Soochow Securities - ‘Insurance Industry Review H1 2025 and Outlook’ (https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202507181710800851_1.pdf)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.