Leidos (LDOS) Assessment Report on Government Spending Cycles and VA Contract Risks
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Related Stocks
Based on the in-depth analysis above, I will provide you with a systematic assessment report on the impact of changes in government spending cycles on Leidos’ valuation.
Leidos’ current stock price is
According to Leidos’ FY2024 Annual Report, 87% of the company’s revenue comes from U.S. government contracts, with the
| Impact Factor | Specific Performance |
|---|---|
Budget Cycle Pressure |
The VA faces ongoing budget reviews, and priorities for IT modernization spending may be adjusted |
Contract Recompetition Risk |
High-margin VA contracts face uncertainties in re-tendering |
Policy Uncertainty |
Increased contract reviews brought about by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) reforms |
According to a GovExec report, the most high-profile event in the government contracting space in 2025 was the DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) review of federal contracts. Although Leidos’ contract with the Social Security Administration (SSA) was falsely reported as canceled, actual data shows that contract execution is proceeding normally[3]. This reflects an overreaction in the market to policy risks.
- The federal budget faces austerity pressures, limiting growth in non-defense government IT spending
- Uncertainties from DOGE reforms have delayed some contract decisions
- The VA’s internal priorities are shifting from IT modernization to direct medical services
- The VA’s long-term demand for IT modernization remains rigid (electronic health record systems, veteran health management)
- Historical patterns show that government IT contracts are cyclical, but the long-term growth trend remains unchanged
- Leidos has a deep contract foundation with the VA and strong customer stickiness
U.S. government spending exhibits obvious cyclical characteristics, closely tied to presidential terms, election cycles, and defense budget cycles:
| Cycle Phase | Characteristics | Impact on Government Contractors |
|---|---|---|
Expansion Phase |
Budget increases, new project launches | Accelerated order growth, valuation expansion |
Stabilization Phase |
Flat budgets, contract execution period | Stable cash flow, valuation contraction |
Adjustment Phase |
Budget reviews, contract re-examinations | Slower growth, valuation pressure |
Recovery Phase |
New administration takes office, new cycle begins | Improved expectations, valuation recovery |
The FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) authorizes a
Government Contractor Valuation = f(Backlog, Cash Flow Stability, Contract Recompetition Risk, Policy Sensitivity)
- Beta Coefficient of 0.59: Significantly lower than the overall market, with lower volatility[0]
- Stable Free Cash Flow: FY2024 FCF reached $1.243 billion, with positive FCF margin[0]
- Sufficient Order Backlog: Recently awarded several large contracts, including:
- U.S. Air Force Maintenance Support Contract: $987 million[5]
- Army Force Protection Program Contract: $249 million[5]
- CDC IT Modernization Services Contract: $51 million[6]
- U.S. Air Force Maintenance Support Contract:
- High Policy Sensitivity: 87% of revenue comes from government contracts
- Contract Renewal Risk: Large contracts are typically re-tendered every 3-5 years
- Profit Margin Pressure: The government is shifting from cost-plus contracts to fixed-price contracts
| Indicator Category | Value | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Market Capitalization | $25.14 billion | Large government contractor |
| P/E (TTM) | 17.89x | Below industry average of 25x, valuation discount |
| P/B | 5.12x | Moderate, reflects goodwill value |
| ROE | 30.81% | Excellent, strong shareholder return capability |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.11% | Healthy |
| Current Ratio | 1.62 | Strong short-term solvency |
| Debt Risk Rating | Medium Risk | Moderate financial aggressiveness[0] |
Results based on a three-scenario DCF model show[0]:
| Scenario | Assumptions | Valuation | Relative to Current Price |
|---|---|---|---|
Bear Case |
Zero growth, lower profit margins | $143.16 | -27.2% |
Base Case |
7.9% historical average growth | $214.03 | +8.9% |
Bull Case |
10.9% high growth | $402.32 | +104.6% |
Probability-Weighted |
Combined scenarios | $253.17 | +28.8% |
FY2024 revenue reached
| Fiscal Year | Revenue (USD millions) | YoY Growth | Net Profit (USD millions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2022 | $14,396 | - | $685 |
| FY2023 | $15,438 | +7.2% | $199 |
| FY2024 | $16,662 | +7.9% | $1,254 |
The sharp decline in FY2023 net profit was mainly due to goodwill impairment ($596 million), a one-time non-cash expense. Excluding this factor, profitability remains solid[2].
| Indicator | Value | Signal Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| MACD | No Crossover | Neutral with Bullish Bias |
| KDJ | K:73.6, D:62.5, J:95.7 | Short-term Overbought Risk |
| RSI(14) | Overbought Range | Pullback Pressure |
| Trend Judgment | Sideways Consolidation | No Clear Direction[0] |
| Support Level | $186.80 | - |
| Resistance Level | $198.87 | - |
| Rating | Number of Institutions | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Buy/Overweight | 20 | 74.1% |
| Hold/Neutral | 7 | 25.9% |
| Sell | 0 | 0% |
Consensus Target Price |
$222.50 |
+13.2% Upside Potential [1] |
Leidos has risen
The U.S. government IT services market is highly concentrated, with key players including:
| Company | Positioning | Areas of Strength |
|---|---|---|
Leidos |
Integrated Government Contractor | Defense IT, Healthcare IT |
Booz Allen Hamilton |
Management Consulting | Intelligence, Defense Consulting |
General Dynamics IT |
Defense IT | Military Systems Integration |
CACI International |
Defense Technology | Cybersecurity, Intelligence |
Science Applications International (SAIC) |
Government Services | Aerospace, Systems Engineering |
Leidos’ differentiated advantages include:
- Diversified Business Portfolio: Defense (44%), Health & Civil (30%), Commercial & International (14%), Defense Systems (12%)[2]
- Depth of Technical Capabilities: Presence in cutting-edge fields such as AI, cybersecurity, and autonomous systems
- Stable Customer Relationships: Long-term partnerships with core agencies including the DoD, VA, and FAA
The FY2026 defense budget tilts toward digital modernization, which constitutes a direct tailwind for Leidos:
- 27% Growth in RDT&E Budget: Increased R&D spending benefits technology-focused contractors
- Increased Cybersecurity Budget: Growing demand for zero-trust architecture and quantum cryptography
- Replicator Initiative: Unmanned aerial vehicles and anti-drone systems drive demand for autonomous technologies
- Multi-Domain Operations Concept: Joint combat capability development promotes systems integration business[4]
| Risk Factor | Impact Level | Probability | Risk Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slowing VA Contract Growth | High | Medium | Focus |
| DoD Budget Cuts | High | Low | Monitor |
| DOGE/Government Reform Risks | Medium | High | Focus |
| Delays in Defense IT Modernization | Medium | Low | Monitor |
| Loss of Contract Recompetition | High | Medium | Focus |
| Rising Interest Rates (Financing Costs) | Low | High | Limited Impact |
| Economic Recession (Government Stimulus) | Low | Medium | Hedging Effect |
- VA contracts play an important role in the Health & Civil segment
- Recompetition of high-margin contracts (such as electronic health record systems) may compress profits
- However, the VA’s long-term demand for IT modernization is rigid, and Leidos has advantages as an incumbent
- Media reports have exaggerated the situation, and actual contract execution has not been significantly affected
- The Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) shows that Leidos’ FY2025 contract execution is proceeding normally
- In the long term, government efficiency reforms may instead benefit contractors with technical efficiency advantages[3]
| Valuation Method | Valuation | Implied Return |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Base Case | $214.03 | +8.9% |
| DCF Probability-Weighted | $253.17 | +28.8% |
| Analyst Consensus Target | $222.50 | +13.2% |
| Current Price | $196.61 | - |
| Investor Type | Recommendation |
|---|---|
Long-Term Value Investors |
The current price is attractive; it is recommended to gradually build positions with a target price range of $222-$253 |
Traders |
Focus on the support range of $186-$198 and resistance level of $205-$210 |
Risk-Tolerant Investors |
Consider adding positions after VA contract risks are fully priced in |
Risk-Averse Investors |
Wait for clarity on VA contract prospects before making decisions |
- FY2026 defense budget execution exceeds expectations
- Award of large new defense contracts (e.g., related to the Replicator Initiative)
- Smooth renewal of VA contracts
- Quarterly results exceed expectations (next earnings report: February 10, 2026)
- Significant loss of VA contracts
- DoD budget cuts exceed expectations
- Contract cancellations due to government efficiency reforms
- Government spending cuts due to economic recession
-
Controllable Impact: Slowing VA contract growth mainly affects the Health & Civil segment (30% of revenue), rather than the core defense business (56%)
-
Structural Tailwind Hedge: The FY2026 defense budget tilts toward digital modernization, with a 27% increase in the RDT&E budget, creating growth space for Leidos’ defense IT business
-
Risks Fully Priced In: The current 17.89x P/E ratio represents a 28% discount relative to the industry average of 25x, indicating that VA-related risks have been priced in by the market
-
Solid Fundamentals: 30.81% ROE, $1.243 billion in free cash flow, and sufficient order backlog
-
Long-Term Growth Logic Remains Intact: Long-term trends such as defense IT modernization, cybersecurity, and autonomous systems remain unaffected by policy cycles

The chart above shows:
- Top Left: 2025 Leidos stock price chart, currently in a range-bound consolidation
- Top Right: DCF valuation scenario analysis, with the base case showing 8.9% upside potential
- Bottom Left: Revenue composition analysis, with defense business dominating
- Bottom Right: Government contract risk assessment matrix
[0] Jinling API - Leidos Real-Time Quotes, Financial Analysis, and DCF Valuation Data (2026-01-07)
[1] Jinling API - Leidos Company Profile and Analyst Ratings (2026-01-07)
[2] SEC.gov - Leidos Holdings Inc. 2024 Form 10-K Annual Report (2025-02-11) https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1336920/000133692025000006/ldos-20250103.htm
[3] GovExec - “DOGE was government contracting’s biggest story of 2025” (2025-12) https://www.govexec.com/management/2025/12/doge-was-government-contractings-biggest-story-2025-and-its-not-close/410427/
[4] PSware - “2026 Aerospace and Defense Industry Outlook” (2025) https://www.psware.com/2026-aerospace-and-defense-industry-outlook/
[5] QuiverQuant - Government Contract News (2025) https://www.quiverquant.com/news/category/contracts_automated
[6] Beehiiv - Leidos Contract Awards Coverage (2025) https://beehiiv-images-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/asset/file/c6e98c78-0830-4a32-a72c-77304f690cf4/43.png
[7] Finviz - Leidos Analyst Ratings and Price Target Changes (2025-12) https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=LDOS
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
