Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Analysis of the Surge in Brain-Computer Interface Concept Stocks: The Substantive Correlation Between Neuralink and A-Share Companies

#brain_computer_interface #concept_stocks #neuralink #a_shares #musk #healthcare #investment_analysis #tech_stocks
Mixed
A-Share
January 7, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Analysis of the Surge in Brain-Computer Interface Concept Stocks: The Substantive Correlation Between Neuralink and A-Share Companies

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

688580
--
688580
--
688626
--
688626
--
688575
--
688575
--
688273
--
688273
--
301293
--
301293
--

Let me provide a systematic analysis of the surge in brain-computer interface concept stocks and their substantive correlation with Neuralink’s commercialization progress.


In-Depth Analysis of the Surge in Brain-Computer Interface Concept Stocks: Neuralink’s Commercialization Progress and Substantive Correlation with A-Share Companies
I. Event Recap: The A-Share Brain-Computer Interface Sector Surged 13.7% in a Single Day
1.1 Overview of Market Performance

On January 2, 2026, the first trading day of 2026 for the A-share market, the brain-computer interface sector (Index Code: 886047) performed exceptionally strongly, with a daily surge of

13.7%
and a turnover exceeding
RMB 62.6 billion
, hitting a stage high since last year [1][2]. A large-scale limit-up wave swept through the sector:

Stock Name Price Surge Category
Beiyikang 30CM Limit-Up Leading Stock
Sanbo Brain Hospital 20CM Limit-Up Core Target
Xiangyu Medical 20CM Limit-Up Core Target
Wizmed 20CM Limit-Up Core Target
Apeng Medical 20CM Limit-Up Core Target
Medlander 20CM Limit-Up Core Target
Chengyitong 20CM Limit-Up Core Target

Approximately

more than 30 concept stocks hit limit-up
on the day, fully releasing the market’s profit-making effect [1][3].

1.2 Trigger: Musk’s “Mass Production Announcement”

The core catalyst for this rally was a heavyweight statement from

Elon Musk
. On December 31, 2025, Musk announced on social media platform X:

“Neuralink plans to launch large-scale production of brain-computer interface devices in 2026, while advancing a more streamlined and almost fully automated surgical procedure.” [1][4]

According to his disclosure, the core breakthroughs of the new generation technology are:

  • The electrode wire can directly penetrate the dura mater without resection
    , significantly reducing surgical trauma and complication risks
  • Automated surgical robots
    have reduced the duration of a single procedure from the initial 6 hours to
    within 20 minutes
  • Implantation costs
    have also dropped from the million-dollar range to
    under US$100,000
    , laying the foundation for large-scale implementation [1][5]

II. Panoramic Analysis of Neuralink’s Technology Commercialization Progress
2.1 Technology Evolution Path

Since its establishment in 2016, Neuralink’s technical route has become increasingly clear, and it currently adopts

invasive brain-computer interface technology
with remarkable progress [4][6]:

Time Node Milestone Event Technical Indicators
January 2024 Completed first human transplant surgery First volunteer implanted with N1 chip
September 2025 Clinical trial expansion
12 people
worldwide have been implanted with the device, with a cumulative usage time exceeding
15,000 hours
Summer 2025 Technology conference Demonstrated mind control of computers, drawing, games, and Optimus robot arms
2026
Launch of large-scale production
Number of electrode channels increased to
3,000
, conducting clinical tests for blindsight
2027
Technology iteration Number of electrodes increased to
10,000
, multi-device implantation
2028
Full brain connection Number of electrodes exceeds
25,000
, covering deep brain regions
2.2 Key Commercialization Breakthroughs

Neuralink’s recent clear technological breakthroughs are reflected in three dimensions [4][5][7]:

① Innovation in Automated Surgical Processes

  • Reduced from traditional 6-hour surgery to
    20 minutes
  • Almost fully automated surgical solution
  • Significantly lowers surgical thresholds and labor costs

② Optimization of Cost Structure

  • Implantation costs reduced from
    million-dollar range to under US$100,000
  • Removes economic barriers for large-scale commercial implementation

③ Function Expansion

  • First batch of recipients can already
    type, play games
    with their minds
  • Control range extended to
    assistive robot arms
  • Future plans to control more physical devices through “neural connectivity”
2.3 Market Size Forecast

According to an analysis report by

Morgan Stanley
[4]:

  • Neuralink’s current valuation is approximately
    US$9 billion
    (after the 2025 Series E financing)
  • In the
    U.S. market alone
    , the potential market size of brain-computer interface implantation devices could reach
    US$80 billion
    by 2035
  • Mainly covering the treatment of neurological diseases such as
    amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and stroke

III. Analysis of Substantive Business Correlation of A-Share Brain-Computer Interface Companies
3.1 Fundamental Differences in Technical Routes

By sorting out the business layouts of major A-share concept stocks, a

core issue
can be found:
most A-share companies have fundamental differences in technical routes from Neuralink
[2][8][9]:

Technical Route Neuralink A-Share Company Layout
Mainstream Technology
Invasive
(requires craniotomy for implantation)
Non-invasive
(signal collection outside the scalp)
Signal Collection Flexible electrode wires implanted in the cerebral cortex External devices such as scalp electroencephalography (EEG)
Technical Difficulty High (surgical safety, material biocompatibility) Relatively low (signal accuracy is limited)
Application Scenarios Treatment of severe paralysis, neurological diseases Rehabilitation training, sleep monitoring, concentration improvement

Key Difference Note
: Neuralink uses
invasive
technology that requires craniotomy for implantation, while the vast majority of A-share companies focus on
non-invasive
technical routes. Although there is overlap in application objectives, there is a significant generational gap in core technologies [2][8].

3.2 Substantive Business Analysis of Core Companies
3.2.1 Companies with Brain-Computer Interface Layouts

① Wizmed (688580)

  • Main Business
    : R&D, production, and sales of rehabilitation medical devices, with products used in mental rehabilitation, pelvic and postnatal rehabilitation, neurological rehabilitation, and other fields
  • Substantive Correlation
    : Its new brain-computer interface products
    are in the early stage of market cultivation
    , mainly focusing on
    non-invasive
    technical routes, with significant path differences from Neuralink’s invasive technology. Related products
    have not yet achieved large-scale sales
    and contribute limited to overall revenue [2]

② Xiangyu Medical (688626)

  • Main Business
    : Rehabilitation medical devices covering full rehabilitation scenarios such as occupational therapy, exercise therapy, cognitive speech, and swallowing
  • Substantive Correlation
    : Focuses on
    non-invasive
    brain-computer interface technology, with certain layouts in technology, products, and channel markets. However, as of the end of 2025,
    related products have not achieved large-scale sales
    , accounting for a small proportion of revenue [2][9]

③ YHLO Biotech (688575)

  • Main Business
    : In vitro diagnostic products, covering emergency care, brain disease diagnosis, pediatrics, and other fields
  • Substantive Correlation
    : Layouts through
    strategic cooperation
    , signing a “Strategic Cooperation Framework Agreement” with Shenzhen Brain-Computer Star Chain Technology Co., Ltd. to provide channel empowerment for its brain-computer interface products,
    no self-developed brain-computer interface products have been launched yet
    [2]

④ Medlander (688273)

  • Substantive Correlation
    : Expected to obtain the first brain-computer interface medical device registration certificate (brain-computer interface transcranial magnetic stimulator) in the first quarter of 2026, which is a
    non-invasive
    device [8]
3.2.2 Companies with No Substantive Brain-Computer Interface Business

① Sanbo Brain Hospital (301293)

  • Main Business
    : A medical service group with a focus on neurosurgery, providing comprehensive medical services centered on high-precision neurosurgery
  • Substantive Correlation
    :
    Explicitly stated that it is not involved in the R&D, production, or sales of brain-computer interface products
    , and revenue from neuromodulation technology accounts for an extremely small proportion, having
    basically no impact on the company’s performance
    [2]

② Aerospace Changfeng

  • Main Business
    : Three major segments: military electronics, public security, and high-end medical equipment
  • Substantive Correlation
    :
    Has not actually carried out related businesses such as brain-computer interface
    [2]
3.2.3 Companies with Only Stock Price Volatility

Companies such as Beiyikang, Apeng Medical, Entropy Technology, Mehow Medical, Chengyitong, and Pony Testing

did not disclose substantive correlation information, business details, or technical route information related to brain-computer interfaces
after the surge, which are typical cases of “concept speculation” [2].

3.3 Industrial Chain Substantive Correlation Assessment

Based on industry research and company announcements, a hierarchical assessment of A-share brain-computer interface concept stocks is conducted [6][8][9]:

Industrial Chain Segment Representative Companies Correlation with Neuralink Business Substance
Upstream Core Hardware
Hanwei Technology (flexible sensors) ★☆☆☆☆ Sensor technology has certain versatility but is not dedicated to invasive brain-computer interfaces
Midstream Algorithm Technology
iFLYTEK (emotion recognition algorithms) ★☆☆☆☆ Algorithms have versatility, but there are significant differences from Neuralink’s underlying technology
Downstream Clinical Application
Sanbo Brain Hospital ★☆☆☆☆ Medical service institution, not involved in brain-computer interface product R&D
Rehabilitation Devices
Wizmed, Xiangyu Medical ★☆☆☆☆ Non-invasive devices, different from invasive technical routes

IV. Substantive Correlation Conclusions and Risk Warnings
4.1 Core Conclusions

The surge in A-share brain-computer interface concept stocks and Neuralink’s commercialization progress have the following characteristics
[1][2][4][9]:

Dimension Assessment
Technical Correlation
Extremely low — A-share companies mainly focus on non-invasive technology, with fundamental differences from Neuralink’s invasive technology
Business Correlation
Extremely low — Most companies have negligible brain-computer interface business proportions, or only stay at the cooperation intention stage
Commercialization Progress Correlation
No direct correlation — Neuralink’s 2026 large-scale production will not directly contribute to the performance of A-share companies
Valuation Support
Weak — Current price surge mainly relies on market sentiment and concept speculation, lacking fundamental support
4.2 In-Depth Analysis
4.2.1 Differences in Industry Development Stages
Stage Neuralink China
Clinical Progress
12 people implanted, cumulative usage exceeding 15,000 hours Most products are still in the clinical trial stage
Mass Production Capacity
Launch large-scale production in 2026 Non-invasive products have been commercialized, while invasive ones still take time
Technological Maturity
Third-generation technology (3,000 channels in 2026) Semi-invasive systems such as “Beijing Brain-1” are advancing in clinical trials

Pu Muming, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, frankly stated [8]: “To achieve true brain-computer integration as seen in sci-fi movies, it will take at least 5-10 years.”

4.2.2 Views of Neuralink’s U.S. Competitors

Thomas Oxley, founder of

Synchron
, believes [5]:

  • It will
    take another 3-5 years
    for medical applications of brain-computer interfaces to be approved
  • Consumer-grade implanted devices will take
    at least 15-20 years

This indicates that even for the technologically leading Neuralink, the commercialization path still has considerable uncertainty.

4.3 Risk Warnings

Market professionals have issued warnings
[1][9]:

“Behind the booming market, we need to be alert to the mismatch between technological maturity and commercialization progress. Currently, brain-computer interfaces are still in the clinical validation stage. Both the surgical safety verification of the invasive route and the signal accuracy improvement of the non-invasive route require long-term technological iteration and large-scale clinical data support. The current frenzy in the capital market is clearly divorced from the actual pace of industry development and is overly premature.”


V. Investment Recommendations and Key Focus Areas
5.1 Rational View of Market Hotspots

For investments in brain-computer interface concept stocks, it is recommended to focus on the following indicators [6][8]:

Focus Indicator Specific Content Evaluation Criteria
Product Registration Certificate Progress
Status of obtaining medical device registration certificates Time of first certificate, number of approved certificates
Clinical Data Verification
Clinical trial effectiveness and safety data Sample size, efficacy data
Commercialization Implementation Capability
Actual sales and customer feedback Revenue proportion, repurchase rate
5.2 Identification of Companies with Substantive Businesses

From the industrial chain perspective, A-share companies that have certain correlations with brain-computer interfaces include [6][8]:

Company Related Business Substantive Level
Hanwei Technology
Flexible brain-computer interface materials Upstream hardware with certain technical barriers
iFLYTEK
Brainwave signal algorithms, communication devices for ALS patients Midstream algorithms with patent advantages
Sanbo Brain Hospital
Neurosurgery clinical resources Downstream clinical, but no product business
Xiangyu Medical/Wizmed
Rehabilitation non-invasive devices Certain layouts have been formed, but technical routes are different
5.3 Policies and Industrial Trends

It is worth noting that

policies are actively supporting the development of the brain-computer interface industry
[9][10]:

  • Brain-computer interface has been included in the future industry direction of the national “15th Five-Year Plan”
  • Shanghai issued the “Action Plan for Cultivating the Future Industry of Brain-Computer Interfaces (2025—2030)”, clarifying that by 2027, it will promote more than 5 invasive and semi-invasive products to complete clinical trials
  • Beijing has established a special incubation fund for brain-computer interfaces, with a single maximum financing amount exceeding RMB 50 million

VI. Summary

Core Conclusion
: In January 2026, A-share brain-computer interface concept stocks surged 13.7%, mainly driven by Musk’s announcement that Neuralink will launch large-scale production in 2026. However,
there is a huge technical and business gap between A-share brain-computer interface companies and Neuralink
:

  1. Different technical routes
    : Neuralink focuses on invasive technology, while most A-share companies focus on non-invasive layouts
  2. Extremely weak business correlation
    : Most companies have negligible brain-computer interface business proportions, or only have cooperation intentions
  3. Disconnected commercialization progress
    : Neuralink’s commercialization will not directly contribute to the performance of A-share companies
  4. Valuation divorced from fundamentals
    : Current price surge mainly relies on market sentiment rather than substantive business improvement

When participating in such concept speculation, investors should maintain a prudent attitude, focus on enterprises with

substantive technological accumulation, registration certificate progress, and commercialization capabilities
, and avoid blindly chasing gains and getting trapped.


References

[1] Sina Finance - “Brain-Computer Interface ‘Speculation’ is Too Premature” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2026-01-06/doc-inhfivet7316585.shtml)

[2] 21st Century Business Herald - “Brain-Computer Interface Concept Surges, What is the Substance of Related Listed Companies’ Businesses?” (https://www.21jingji.com/article/20260106/herald/90ea0f8e98b078736e9ce6ee511f6f45.html)

[3] Securities Times - “Leading Stocks Hit Limit-Up! Low-Altitude Economy Takes the Spotlight” (https://stcn.com/article/detail/3570575.html)

[4] Wall Street China - “Musk Releases ‘Mass Production Timeline’, Brain-Computer Interface Stocks Surge Limit-Up, Is the Commercialization Inflection Point Coming?” (https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3762545)

[5] World Internet Conference - “Musk: In 2026, Neuralink Launches ‘Large-Scale Mass Production’” (https://cn.wicinternet.org/2026-01/04/content_38517304.htm)

[6] Jiuyangongshe - “Brain-Computer Interface Concept Surges: Musk’s Mass Production Announcement Ignites a Hundred-Billion Track” (https://www.jiuyangongshe.com/a/jjw4xqwxdh)

[7] Eastmoney - “Brain-Computer Interface Becomes a Capital ‘Favorite’, Strong Brain Technology Completes RMB 2 Billion Financing, Second Only to Neuralink in Scale” (https://finance.eastmoney.com/a/202601063610339031.html)

[8] TMTPost - “Brain-Computer Interface 2025: Policy Orientation, Technological Breakthroughs, Capital Inflow, Medical Application Takes the Lead” (https://www.ebrun.com/20260101/634623.shtml)

[9] Securities Times - “Musk’s Mass Production Announcement Ignites the Market, Brain-Computer Interface Commercialization Accelerates, Chinese Industrial Clusters Emerge” (https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/3572633.html)

[10] Caifuhao - “Brain-Computer Interface ‘Speculation’ is Too Premature” (https://caifuhao.eastmoney.com/news/20260106101014171473140)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.