Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Geely G-ASD Intelligent Driving System Launch and Competitor Comparison Analysis

#智能驾驶 #吉利G-ASD #竞品对比 #自动驾驶市场 #汽车科技
Mixed
HK Stock
January 6, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Geely G-ASD Intelligent Driving System Launch and Competitor Comparison Analysis

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

0175.HK
--
0175.HK
--
TSLA
--
TSLA
--

The following is a systematic analysis of the launch of Geely’s G-ASD and its impact on intelligent driving competitiveness, along with a multi-dimensional comparison with competitors such as Tesla FSD, Huawei ADS, and Xpeng XNGP.

  1. Technical Capabilities and Strategic Positioning of Geely G-ASD
  • Core Engine and Architecture: G-ASD is equipped with Geely’s globally first WAM World Behavior Model, adopting the Smart AI Agent architecture to achieve end-to-end optimization of the entire “perception-decision-control” chain [1].
  • Computing Power and Model Scale: The cloud-based multimodal large model + world model has a parameter scale of 100 billion levels, significantly improving environmental perception and reasoning capabilities [1].
  • Data Assets and Verification: It has industry-leading ADAS mileage data (8.5 million vehicles accumulated, 10 billion kilometers), 25 million training video clips, and integrates Volvo’s safety DNA with a million-level accident safety dataset [1].
  • Hardware Redundancy and Evolution: From the H7 solution (lidar +31 perception components) to the H9 solution (5 lidars, dual Thor chips with 1400 TOPS computing power) provides a base for high-level intelligent driving [1].
  • Roadmap and Implementation: Full-cycle planning from L2 to L4; high-speed L3 and low-speed L4 will be pushed within 2026 if regulations permit, and Robotaxi operations will be realized. Currently, the first version has been installed on multiple models of Zeekr and Lynk & Co [1].
  • Globalization and Ecological Integration: Achieve cross-domain integration (intelligent driving domain, cockpit domain, chassis domain, power domain) through “Global AI 2.0”, and participate in global competition as a “space-ground integrated” AI technology enterprise [1].

II. Key Differences from Tesla FSD, Huawei ADS, and Xpeng XNGP

  • Tesla FSD:

    • Technical Route: End-to-end neural network; FSD v14.2.1.25 completed a 2732-mile zero-takeover cross-US drive, verifying long-distance high reliability [2].
    • Data Accumulation: As of the end of 2025, global intelligent driving mileage exceeded 11 billion kilometers, with an accident rate significantly lower than the average [2][3].
    • Commercialization and Ecology: Has started Robotaxi testing without safety officers; uses the same software to drive mass-produced cars and Robotaxis with a unified architecture [2].
    • Market Position: Has first-mover advantage and brand awareness in North America and Europe.
  • Huawei ADS:

    • L3 Commercialization Progress: ADS 4.0 supports high-speed L3, which is China’s first high-speed L3 commercial solution; installed on models such as AITO M9 and Zhijie S800 [3].
    • End-to-End Learning: Adopts the end-to-end paradigm of “end-to-end learning + behavior large model”, reducing system response time by 50% and having stronger adaptability to complex environments [3].
    • Planning: Conditional L3 pilot at the end of 2025; large-scale L3 commercialization in 2026; L4 promotion in 2027 [3].
    • Market Impact: Has a strong reputation in high-end models and intelligent driving experience, with obvious Huawei ecosystem collaboration.
  • Xpeng XNGP:

    • Technical Iteration: The second-generation VLA system (vision-language-action fusion) achieves self-evolution; the FastDriveVLA pruning framework optimizes efficiency [5].
    • Coverage and Mapless: Achieves mapless coverage in 2595 cities nationwide, with 7.56 million kilometers of real-vehicle testing [5].
    • Hardware and Chips: Self-developed Turing AI chips (3 chips with total computing power of 2250 TOPS); pure vision with 8 cameras for 360° coverage [5].
    • Planning: Push VLA in Q1 2026; 2026 Ultra quasi-L4 software; target to surpass Tesla before August 2026 [5].
  • Geely G-ASD’s Differences and Advantages:

    • Highest Model Content Ratio: Multimodal + world model parameters reach 100 billion, higher than the average parameter scale of current mainstream solutions (refer to reports and public disclosures of various routes) [1].
    • Combination of Data and Safety Assets: “Safety Data Flywheel” of 10 billion kilometers mileage + million-level accident data + Volvo’s safety DNA [1].
    • Cross-domain Collaboration: Global AI 2.0 achieves cross-domain data connectivity and model integration, solving the “silos” problem [1].
    • Global Brand and Product Line Endorsement: Multi-brand collaboration such as Zeekr, Lynk & Co, and Geely Galaxy; overseas layout and localized production continue to advance [4].
    • Compared with Tesla: Has advantages in L3/L4 localization and compliance, lidar redundancy solutions, and data security localization.
    • Compared with Huawei/Xpeng: Has more comprehensive advantages in cross-domain integration, safety data assets, and global brand influence.

III. Market Prospects and Competitive Landscape

  • Market Trends: It is expected that the penetration rate of high-level autonomous driving will accelerate in 2026, and L4-L5 may break through in 2027-2028 [6]. The installation rate of L2 and above intelligent driving in China has increased significantly, and the L2+ configuration rate of high-end models has reached a high level [7].
  • Industry Elimination: Some independent intelligent driving companies have suspended operations or been acquired; industrial integration is accelerating, forming ecological alliances centered on core technology enterprises [7].
  • Commercialization Path: Whoever can balance “computing power + algorithm + data + tool chain” with systematic cost reduction will promote the penetration rate of high-level intelligent driving [7].
  • Geely’s Opportunity: Relying on G-ASD’s high model content ratio, cross-domain collaboration, and safety data assets, combined with multi-brand global layout, it is expected to form differentiated competitiveness in the mid-to-high-end market and overseas markets.

IV. Financial and Business Impact

  • Geely (0175.HK): Market capitalization of 179.8 billion USD, share price of 17.83 HKD, PE 10.73x. Total sales in the first 11 months of 2025 increased by 42% YoY, new energy sales increased by 97% YoY [0][4]; Galaxy brand increased by 150% YoY [4].
  • Tesla (TSLA): Market capitalization of 1.45 trillion USD, share price of 451.67 USD, PE about 276.68x [0]. Q3 2025 EPS was 0.50 USD, revenue was 28.09 billion USD [0]. FSD and Robotaxi are important valuation drivers.
  • Huawei/Xpeng: Mainly influence the industry pattern through deep binding between the automotive BU and vehicle manufacturers and ecological collaboration (Huawei ADS, Volkswagen’s cooperation on Turing chips) [5][7].

V. Comprehensive Evaluation and Risks

  • Impact of G-ASD on Geely’s Competitiveness: Significantly improves Geely’s comprehensive competitiveness in “technical model content ratio, cross-domain collaboration, safety data assets, globalization and multi-brand collaboration”, and consolidates its mid-to-high-end and intelligent driving leading image.
  • Risks:
    • Uncertainty in technology implementation and regulatory pace.
    • Need to balance R&D investment and commercial returns under industry integration and capital pressure.
    • Tesla has advantages in global market and software ecology, Huawei in domestic high-end ecology and channels, Xpeng in Chinese scenarios and iteration speed; competition is fierce.

Conclusion:

  • G-ASD represents Geely’s key leap from “environmental interaction” to “human-machine collaboration”; its high model content ratio, cross-domain integration, and safety data flywheel build a differentiated technical moat [1].
  • Compared with Tesla FSD, Geely has more advantages in L3/L4 localization, multi-sensor redundancy, and data compliance; compared with Huawei/Xpeng, Geely’s cross-domain collaboration and global brand and product line support its differentiated competition.
  • Market Prospects: 2026-2028 will be a key window period for high-level intelligent driving; if Geely can accelerate the mass production and ecological collaboration of G-ASD at home and abroad, it is expected to gain a favorable position in the intelligent driving elimination competition.

References:
[0] Jinling API Data (Real-time quotes and company overview of Geely, Tesla)
[1] Gaishi Auto - “CES 2026: Geely Global AI 2.0 Launched, G-ASD Intelligent Driving Moves Towards L3/L4” (https://m.gasgoo.com/news/70441380.html)
[2] FX168 Financial Network - “Tesla Owner First Achieves Zero-Takeover Cross-US Drive with Full FSD” (https://www.fx168news.com/article/特斯拉-981397)
[3] Wall Street见闻/Sina Finance - “2026 AI Main Line is Clear: Computing Power as Foundation, Mobile Phones as Breakthrough” (Including ADS 4.0 Progress) (https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3762504)
[4] Yiche - “Geely Auto Sales Exceed 3.02 Million in 2025” (https://auto.ifeng.com/c/8pb5bK9BvvU)
[5] CSDN - “Latest Progress of Xpeng’s End-to-End Autonomous Driving” (https://blog.csdai.com.cn/luoganttcc/article/156550741)
[6] Sina Finance - “In-depth Research on Intelligent Car Industry: Product Access for L3 Models” (https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/relnews/hk/2026-01-05/doc-inhfhavm2085992.shtml)
[7] Science and Technology Daily - “Intelligent Driving ‘Elimination Competition’ Upgraded, Industry Pattern Accelerates Shuffling” (https://www.stdaily.com/web/gdxw/2025-12/25/content_452794.html)

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.