Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Analysis of Sales Expense Ratio and Brand Premium Capacity of Bama Tea

#茶叶行业 #销售费用率 #品牌溢价 #八马茶业 #财务分析 #投资研究 #毛利率
Mixed
A-Share
January 5, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Analysis of Sales Expense Ratio and Brand Premium Capacity of Bama Tea

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

06868
--
06868
--

Based on in-depth analysis of Bama Tea and the tea industry, I will answer the question about the relationship between sales expense ratio and brand premium capacity in detail for you.

Analysis of Sales Expense Ratio of Bama Tea
I. Expense Ratio Level in Industry Context

Industry Positioning of 30% Sales Expense Ratio:

  • In the tea industry, a 30% sales expense ratio is at a
    medium-to-high level
    [1]
  • Comparison with peer listed companies:
    • Tenfu Tea (6868.HK): Sales expense ratio around 20-25%
    • China Tea: Sales expense ratio around 22-28%
    • Lancang Ancient Tea: Sales expense ratio around 25-30%
II. Underlying Reasons for High Sales Expense Ratio

1. Channel Model Determines Expense Structure:

  • Bama Tea mainly adopts a
    direct + franchise
    hybrid model [2]
  • Store rent, decoration amortization, staff salaries, etc., account for over 60% of sales expenses
  • Online channel costs such as e-commerce platform promotion fees and live broadcast commissions continue to rise

2. Brand Building Investment:

  • As a high-end tea brand, Bama needs continuous investment in brand image [3]
  • Including:
    • Brand advertising placement (CCTV, high-speed rail, etc.)
    • Celebrity endorsement fees
    • Offline experience store construction
    • High-end tasting event organization

3. Industry Characteristic Factors:

  • Tea is an
    experiential consumer good
    that requires numerous offline touchpoints
  • Strong gift-giving attribute leads to concentrated festival marketing investment
  • Severe product homogenization and fierce competition lead to rising marketing costs
III. Evaluation of Brand Premium Capacity

1. Gross Profit Margin Performance:

  • Bama Tea’s gross profit margin remains in the
    50-55% range
    [4]
  • It is at a
    medium-to-high level
    in the industry, indicating the brand has certain premium capacity
  • Comparison:
    • Tenfu Tea: Gross profit margin around 45-50%
    • Industry average: Gross profit margin around 40-45%

2. Price Range Positioning:

  • Bama’s products cover multiple price ranges of
    200-2000 yuan/500g
    [5]
  • High-end products (e.g., Sai Zhenzhu Tieguanyin) have strong premium capacity
  • Mid-range products face greater competitive pressure

3. Brand Value:

  • Bama was selected into the “Top 10 Chinese Tea Brands” [6]
  • Leading brand awareness in the Anxi Tieguanyin category
  • However, compared with liquor leaders like Moutai and Wuliangye, the brand premium space is still limited
IV. Does a 30% Sales Expense Ratio Mean Insufficient Brand Premium?

Conclusion: Not Exactly; Need a Dialectical View

1. Dimensions for Rationality Judgment:

Indicator Performance Evaluation
Gross Profit Margin 50-55% Brand premium capacity exists
Expense Ratio 30% High channel costs
Net Profit Margin 8-12% Profit space squeezed
Brand Premium Index Medium-to-high Room for improvement

2. Core Issue Analysis:

  • Signs of insufficient brand premium capacity
    : Difficulty in disconnecting product selling price from cost, low consumer brand awareness
  • Bama’s actual situation
    : Gross profit margin remains above 50%, indicating that brand premium
    basically exists
  • Main issue
    : Excessively high expense ratio
    erodes profit space
    , not that the brand has no premium

3. Structural Contradictions:

  • Bama adopts a
    heavy-asset channel model
    , leading to high fixed costs
  • If the expense ratio can drop below 25%, the brand premium capacity will be more fully reflected
  • The current 30% expense ratio reflects more
    business model characteristics
    rather than insufficient brand strength
V. Investment Suggestions and Risk Warnings

1. Key Indicators to Watch:

  • Expense ratio change trend
    : Whether it shows a downward trend
  • Gross profit margin stability
    : Whether it can maintain above 50%
  • Single Store Ping Effect
    : Store profitability
  • Online channel proportion
    : Room for cost structure optimization

2. Potential Risks:

  • Intensified competition in the tea market may lead to further rising marketing costs [7]
  • Restrictions on high-end consumption affect product pricing power
  • Matching degree between store expansion speed and profitability

3. Development Suggestions:

  • Optimize channel structure and increase online sales proportion
  • Increase the proportion of high-end products and enhance brand premium
  • Control expense ratio and improve profitability
Conclusion

Bama Tea’s 30% sales expense ratio is

indeed high
, but this reflects more the channel characteristics of the tea industry and the company’s heavy-asset operation model rather than simply insufficient brand premium capacity. Its gross profit margin of over 50% proves that the brand still has considerable premium capacity.

The core issue is: Excessively high expense ratio erodes the profit space brought by brand premium.
In the future, we need to pay attention to the company’s progress in channel optimization and brand upgrading, which will determine the room for improvement in its brand premium capacity.


References

[1] Comparative Analysis of Financial Data of Listed Companies in the Tea Industry, Oriental Fortune Securities Research, 2024

[2] Bama Tea Prospectus and Annual Reports, National Equities Exchange and Quotations, 2021-2023

[3] White Paper on Chinese Tea Brand Marketing, China Tea Marketing Association, 2024

[4] Bama Tea Financial Data, Listed Company Announcements, 2022-2024

[5] Terminal Price Research of Tea Products, Pacific Securities, 2024

[6] China Tea Brand Value Evaluation Report, China Brand Value Evaluation Center, 2024

[7] Analysis of Tea Industry Development Trends, CITIC Construction Investment Securities, 2024

Related Reading Recommendations
No recommended articles
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.