Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Warning Analysis of Moore Threads and Muxi GPU Stock Price Corrections on Biren's Valuation

#gpu #半导体 #估值分析 #股价回调 #国产替代 #科技投资 #中概股
Neutral
A-Share
January 3, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Warning Analysis of Moore Threads and Muxi GPU Stock Price Corrections on Biren's Valuation

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Based on the latest market data, I will provide an in-depth analysis of the warning significance of Moore Threads and Muxi GPU stock price corrections on Biren’s valuation.

Comparative Analysis of Core Data
Market Value Changes of Three GPU Companies
Company Listing Time First-day Maximum Gain Maximum Market Value Current Market Value Correction Magnitude
Moore Threads December 2025 500% 442.2 billion yuan 276.3 billion yuan -37.5%
Muxi Semiconductor December 2025 755% 358 billion yuan ~246.1 billion yuan -35%
Biren Technology January 2026 80% 90 billion HKD 84.6 billion HKD -6%

The cumulative market value of the three GPU companies has shrunk by over 280 billion yuan from their peaks
[1][2]

Financial Data Comparison (2025 Forecast/Actual)
Indicator Moore Threads Muxi Semiconductor Biren Technology
Revenue Scale 1.2-1.498 billion yuan 1.5-1.98 billion yuan 58.9 million yuan (H1)
Loss Amount 730-116.8 million yuan 527-76.3 million yuan 1.6 billion yuan (H1)
Cumulative Loss (2022-2024) Over 5 billion yuan 3.05 billion yuan Over 6.3 billion yuan
R&D Investment Ratio 626% 121.24% 245.5%
Four Valuation Warning Signals
1.
Serious Divergence Between Valuation and Fundamentals

Biren Technology’s first-half 2025 revenue was only 589 million yuan, yet it supported a market value of 76 billion yuan, with a price-to-sales ratio as high as approximately 1289 times[1][3]. In contrast, although Moore Threads and Muxi Semiconductor have larger revenue scales (1.2-2 billion yuan), they also face the dilemma of market value far exceeding revenue support.

2.
Sustained Huge Losses Cannot Support High Valuations

All three companies are in a state of sustained losses:

  • Biren Technology has accumulated losses of over 6.3 billion yuan, with R&D investment reaching 3.38 billion yuan[1]
  • Moore Threads lost over 5 billion yuan from 2022 to 2024[1]
  • Muxi Semiconductor accumulated losses of 3.05 billion yuan[1]

Excessively High R&D Expense Ratio
(generally over 100%) means that revenue growth is difficult to cover R&D investment, and the profit path is unclear.

3.
Extremely Low Market Share and Huge Competitive Pressure

According to prospectus data, Biren Technology’s market share in China’s intelligent computing chip market in 2024 was only

0.16%
, and its share in the general GPU market was only
0.2%
[4]. The top two players (both U.S. manufacturers) occupy 98% of the market share.

4.
Market Sentiment Has Shifted from Frenzy to Rationality

The sharp correction in the stock prices of Moore Threads and Muxi Semiconductor indicates:

  • The “surge myth” in the initial post-listing period is unsustainable[1][2]
  • Investors are shifting from chasing concepts to prudently evaluating fundamentals
  • Biren Technology’s first-day gain of only 80% reflects the market’s vigilance against high valuation risks[1]
Specific Warnings for Biren’s Valuation
Short-term Warnings:
  1. Avoid Repeating the Boom-and-Bust Cycle
    : Moore Threads and Muxi Semiconductor fell from over 700% gains to below 80%, and Biren’s relatively restrained first-day gain is a signal of the market’s return to rationality[1]

  2. High Valuations Are Unsustainable
    : With current revenue scale, Biren Technology’s 76 billion yuan market value requires approximately
    100 times
    revenue growth to reach a reasonable price-to-sales ratio level

Long-term Warnings:
  1. Technology Implementation Is Key
    : Accelerate the commercial implementation of GPU chips and convert technical advantages into actual revenue[2][4]

  2. Software and Hardware Ecosystem Construction
    : Compared with NVIDIA’s CUDA ecosystem, the software ecosystem of domestic GPUs remains a shortcoming[2]

  3. Unclear Profit Timeline
    : The gap between huge R&D investment and limited revenue is difficult to bridge in the short term[1][3]

Conclusion

The stock price corrections of Moore Threads and Muxi Semiconductor have sounded an alarm for Biren Technology and the entire domestic GPU industry:

the capital market’s valuation logic is shifting from expectation-driven to fundamentals-driven
[1][2].

Although the GPU track benefits from the historical opportunity of the AI large model era,

technological breakthroughs, commercial implementation, and profitability
are still the core elements supporting high valuations. The cumulative market value of the three companies has shrunk by over 280 billion yuan from their peaks, fully demonstrating that
high valuations脱离 fundamentals are unsustainable
[1].

For investors, it is more important to rationally view the long-term development potential of domestic GPUs, focus on technology implementation progress and profit improvement inflection points, rather than chasing short-term stock price fluctuations.


References

[1] CNfol.com - 《From 700% to 80% Gain: Why Didn’t Biren Repeat Moore Threads and Muxi’s Surge Myth?》(http://mp.cnfol.com/13337/article/1767334627-142195362.html)

[2] Eastmoney.com - 《Competing for the “China NVIDIA” Title! Domestic GPU Market Share Targets 50%》(https://wap.eastmoney.com/a/202512283603663940.html)

[3] Securities Times - 《Domestic GPU Manufacturers Rushing to List Have Not Exceeded 1% Market Share》(https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/3546675.html)

[4] Securities Times - 《Complete Overview! Biren Technology Goes Public, Market Value Surges to 90 Billion HKD》(https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/3568288.html)

Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.