Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Comparative Analysis Report on R&D Investment Between Insta360 and DJI

#研发投入 #技术研发 #科技公司对比 #专利分析 #消费电子 #无人机行业 #创新驱动 #研发团队
Neutral
A-Share
January 2, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Comparative Analysis Report on R&D Investment Between Insta360 and DJI

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Based on collected public data and market information, the following is a detailed comparative analysis of technical R&D investment between Insta360 and DJI:

I. Comparison of R&D Investment Scale
Insta360
Indicator Data Time Node Source
Cumulative R&D investment in the past three years 1.48 billion yuan 2022-2024 [1][5]
R&D investment in H1 2025 562 million yuan Jan-Jun 2025 [2]
YoY growth of R&D investment 100.35% H1 2025 [2]
R&D investment as a percentage of revenue 15.30% H1 2025 [2]
Cumulative revenue proportion in the past three years 13.16% 2022-2024 [1][5]
DJI
Indicator Data Time Node Source
Revenue scale About 80 billion yuan 2024 [6]
Revenue scale About50 billion yuan 2023 [4]
Planned total R&D investment over7 years About30 billion yuan 2024-2030 [6]
Annual average R&D investment About5 billion yuan Estimated [6]

Comparison Analysis
: In terms of absolute scale, DJI’s R&D investment is far higher than Insta360’s. According to market news, DJI plans to invest about30 billion yuan in R&D from2024 to2030, with an annual average R&D investment of about5 billion yuan [6]. Insta360’s R&D investment in H12025 was562 million yuan [2], and the full-year estimate is about1.1-1.2 billion yuan, which is about4-5 times less than DJI’s.

II. Comparison of R&D Intensity
Insta360’s R&D Intensity

Insta360’s R&D investment as a percentage of operating revenue remains at a high level:

  • H12025:15.30%, an increase of3.75 percentage points compared to the same period last year [2]
  • Average level over the past three years:13.16% [1][5]
Estimated R&D Intensity of DJI

Although DJI has not disclosed specific details of R&D expenses, estimates can be made based on public information:

  • Calculated based on2024 revenue of about80 billion yuan, if R&D investment is about5 billion yuan, the R&D intensity is about6.25%
  • Estimated based on2023 revenue of about50 billion yuan, assuming the R&D investment intensity is comparable to DJI’s historical level, it is expected to be in the range of8%-12%

Comparison Analysis
: Insta360’s R&D intensity (13-15%) is significantly higher than DJI’s estimated R&D intensity (6-12%). This indicates that as a relatively small enterprise, Insta360 is catching up to the industry-leading position through a higher proportion of R&D investment, reflecting a strong technology innovation-driven strategy.

III. Comparison of R&D Teams
Insta360’s R&D Team
Indicator Data Remarks
Number of R&D personnel 1,836 people H12025 [2]
Proportion of R&D personnel 56.75% As a percentage of total company employees [2]
Educational background composition 17 PhDs,575 masters,1,058 bachelors High proportion of highly educated talents [2]
Age structure 49.78% are aged between30-39 Young and middle-aged employees are the backbone [2]
DJI’s R&D Team
Indicator Data Remarks
Total number of employees 14,000 people [3]
Proportion of R&D personnel About45% [4]
Core R&D strength Comes from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Campus, etc. Recommended by founder’s mentor Professor Li Zexiang [4]

Comparison Analysis
: Insta360’s proportion of R&D personnel (56.75%) is higher than DJI’s (about45%) [2][4]. This reflects the differences in talent strategies between the two companies:

  • As a growing enterprise, Insta360 allocates more than half of its employees to R&D positions, reflecting a technology-prioritized development strategy
  • Although DJI’s proportion of R&D personnel is relatively low, the absolute number is larger, and it has a more mature talent training and introduction system
IV. Comparison of Patent Reserves
Insta360’s Patent Status
Indicator Data Time Node
Domestic and foreign authorized patents 998 items June2025 [2]
Invention patents 222 items Accounting for 22.2% [2]
Utility model patents 378 items [2]
Design patents 398 items [2]
As of the end of2024 900 authorized patents, 189 invention patents [5]
DJI’s Patent Status
Indicator Data Time Node
Cumulative number of patent applications Over8,600 2023 [4]
Core hardware patents More than4,000 [6]
23 core technology fields including flight control systems and machine vision Patent matrix [4]

Comparison Analysis
: DJI’s patent reserves are far more than Insta360’s:

  • DJI has accumulated over8,600 patent applications [4], while Insta360 has 998 items [2]
  • In terms of core hardware (motors, ESCs, etc.), DJI has more than4,000 patents [6]
  • Insta360’s patents are mainly concentrated in image technology fields such as panoramic image stitching, AI image processing, and anti-shake algorithms [5]
V. Comparison of Key Technical R&D Areas
Insta360’s Core Technical Directions
Technology Field Technology Name Technology Level
Panoramic technology Panoramic image acquisition and stitching technology Supports11K2D/10K3D acquisition, multi-channel exposure synchronization error <1ms (industry-leading) [5]
Anti-shake technology FlowState anti-shake technology Iconic technology, effectively eliminates motion blur [1]
AI technology AI image processing technology Applied to intelligent editing, AI highlight capture, gesture control, etc. [1][2]
Computational photography Multi-lens fusion technology 1-inch panoramic image system, native8K panoramic video [6]
DJI’s Core Technical Directions
Technology Field Technology Name Technology Level
Flight control system Autonomous flight control system Core technology fully self-developed [4][6]
Machine vision Intelligent sensing and obstacle avoidance AI vision system enables autonomous obstacle avoidance and target tracking [4]
Core hardware Motors, ESCs, image transmission chips Full-stack self-developed, free from dependence on Qualcomm and Texas Instruments [6]
LiDAR Zenmuse L3 LiDAR Price is only1/10 of similar overseas products [6]
VI. Summary Comparison
Comparison Dimension Insta360 DJI Difference Analysis
R&D investment scale
Annual average about1.1-1.2 billion yuan Annual average about5 billion yuan DJI is 4-5 times that of Insta360
R&D intensity
13-15% About8-12% Insta360 has higher R&D intensity
Proportion of R&D personnel
56.75% About45% Insta360 focuses more on R&D talents
Number of patents
998 items Over8,600 items DJI has richer patent reserves
Technical route
Image algorithms, AI processing Flight control systems, core hardware Differentiated technical layout
Revenue scale
Relatively small (not disclosed) 80 billion yuan (2024) DJI is larger in scale
Core Difference Summary
  1. Significant gap in investment scale
    : DJI’s annual average R&D investment is about5 billion yuan, which is 4-5 times that of Insta360, matching DJI’s industry-leading position and wider product line.

  2. Higher R&D intensity of Insta360
    : Insta360 invests13-15% of its revenue in R&D, which is higher than DJI’s estimated 8-12%, reflecting the follower’s strategy of gaining competitive advantage through high-intensity R&D.

  3. Different focuses in talent allocation
    : More than56% of Insta360’s employees are engaged in R&D, while DJI’s is about45%, but DJI has a more mature talent training system and a larger absolute number of R&D teams.

  4. Differences in patent layout
    : DJI has deep accumulation in core hardware (flight control, motors, ESCs), while Insta360 has formed characteristics in software algorithm fields such as panoramic image processing and AI algorithms.

  5. Degree of independent technical research
    : DJI has achieved full-stack independent research from core chips and algorithms to complete machines [6], while Insta360 has established a complete technical system in panoramic technology and intelligent image innovation [2].

The differences in R&D investment between the two companies reflect their different development stages and market positioning: as an emerging image equipment manufacturer, Insta360 is quickly establishing technical barriers through high-intensity R&D investment; DJI, relying on its industry-leading position, is conducting technical layout and deep cultivation in a wider range of fields.

References

[1] Insta360 Company Research Report (https://www.kimi.com/share/zh/d19v3e8nnlr1nd3psl70)

[2] Insta360 Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. 2025 Semi-Annual Report (http://notice.10jqka.com.cn/api/pdf/35cb6d550db868d.pdf)

[3] DJI - Wikipedia (https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/大疆创新)

[4] Mastering One Leading Company a Day: DJI - Sina Finance (https://finance.sina.com.cn/jjxw/2025-05-15/doc-inewruvx9458643.shtml)

[5] Leading Panoramic Intelligent Image Equipment Company, Growth Driven by Technology Escort + Product Innovation (https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP202506271698620029_1.pdf)

[6] The Lowest-Profile DJI, Seizing the Fiercest Market - The Paper (https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_31988330)

Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.