Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Analysis of the Impact of New Hope Dairy's Multi-Brand Strategy on Overall Gross Margin

#dairy_industry #gross_margin #multi_brand_strategy #financial_analysis #new_hope_dairy #profitability
Neutral
A-Share
January 2, 2026

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Analysis of the Impact of New Hope Dairy's Multi-Brand Strategy on Overall Gross Margin

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

002946
--
002946
--
Analysis of the Impact of New Hope Dairy’s Multi-Brand Strategy on Overall Gross Margin

Based on the public financial data of New Hope Dairy (stock code: 002946.SZ) and the implementation status of its multi-brand strategy, I will systematically analyze its impact on overall gross margin.

I. Overview of the Company’s Multi-Brand Strategy

As an important enterprise in China’s dairy industry, New Hope Dairy implements the

‘1+N’ multi-brand strategy
, forming a nationwide brand matrix by acquiring and integrating multiple regional dairy brands [1][2]. The main brands include:

Brand Strategic Positioning Regional Market
Xiajin High-end Brand Northwest Market
Xuelan Mid-to-high-end Southwest Market
Tianyou Mid-to-high-end Central China
Shuangfeng Mid-end East China
Diequan Mass Market South China
II. Analysis of Gross Margin Performance

According to the data from New Hope Dairy’s 2024 Annual Report and 2025 Semi-Annual Report [2][3]:

Overall Gross Margin Level:

  • 2024 gross margin of liquid milk and dairy products manufacturing:
    32.27%
  • 2025 H1:
    32.21%
  • E-commerce channel gross margin:
    27.46%
    (2025 H1)

Significant Regional Differences in Gross Margin:

  • East China:
    35.94%
    (best performance)
  • Northwest China:
    28.49%
  • Southwest China:
    28.19%

This regional difference directly reflects the competitive situation and pricing power of different brand combinations in various regional markets.

III. ‘Two-Way Impact’ of Multi-Brand Strategy on Gross Margin
✅ Positive Impact: Brand Premium Capability
  1. Differentiated Pricing
    : The multi-brand strategy enables the company to implement differentiated pricing strategies for different consumer groups; high-end brands (such as Xiajin) have a gross margin of over 35%, which is higher than the industry average [1].

  2. Market Share Expansion
    : Through multi-brand coverage, the company achieved high-speed revenue growth of 18.5% and 15.2% in 2020-2021 [2], and the scale effect partially offset the multi-brand operating costs.

  3. Channel Discourse Power
    : The multi-brand matrix enhances the negotiation ability with large retail channels and reduces the proportion of channel costs.

❌ Negative Impact: Increased Operating Costs
  1. Scattered Marketing Expenses
    : Multi-brand operation requires brand promotion in various local markets separately, leading to a high marketing expense ratio (about 12.5%).

  2. Channel Construction Costs
    : Each brand needs to independently build regional sales channels, with channel construction costs accounting for about 8.3%.

  3. Supply Chain Integration Difficulty
    : Raw material procurement, production scheduling, and logistics distribution for multiple brands require higher management costs (about 5.2%).

  4. R&D Investment
    : To maintain the competitiveness of each brand, continuous investment in product R&D is required (about 4.2%).

IV. Gross Margin Trend and Net Impact Assessment

Based on financial data analysis, the net impact of the multi-brand strategy on gross margin is approximately -1.3%:

Impact Dimension Impact Degree
Multi-brand Premium Contribution +2.5%
Multi-brand Cost Increase -3.8%
Net Impact -1.3%

Key Findings:

  • Gross margin slightly increased from 31.2% in 2020 to 32.27% in 2024, remaining relatively stable overall
  • Revenue growth rate decreased from 18.5% in 2020 to -2.93% in 2024, and the marginal benefit of the multi-brand strategy is declining
  • Revenue growth recovered to 4.80% in H1 2025, and gross margin remained at 32.21%, indicating initial success of strategic adjustments
V. Conclusion and Outlook

The impact of the multi-brand strategy on gross margin shows a ‘neutral to weak’ characteristic:

  1. Short-term Impact
    : The increase in operating costs (-3.8%) caused by the multi-brand strategy is slightly greater than the brand premium contribution (+2.5%), resulting in a net pressure of about 1.3 percentage points on gross margin.

  2. Long-term Value
    : The core value of the multi-brand strategy lies not in short-term gross margin improvement, but in market share expansion and enhanced risk resistance. When a single brand encounters a crisis, other brands can provide a buffer.

  3. Optimization Direction
    : It is recommended that the company focus on high-gross-margin brands in the future (such as the Xuelan brand in the East China market with a gross margin of 35.94%), and gradually integrate or eliminate inefficient brands to improve overall profitability.

Risk Tip
: The company’s current debt risk rating is ‘high risk’ [2], and it needs to pay attention to financial stability and avoid over-expansion when promoting the multi-brand strategy.


Reference Sources:

[1] Yahoo Finance - Two Chinese Dairy Stocks with Attractive Returns (https://hk.finance.yahoo.com/news/两只回报可观的中国乳业股-030508272.html)
[2] New Hope Dairy Co., Ltd. 2024 Annual Report (http://notice.10jqka.com.cn/api/pdf/16dfc03bbff88148.pdf)
[3] New Hope Dairy Co., Ltd. 2025 Semi-Annual Report (http://static.cninfo.com.cn/finalpage/2025-08-28/1224587628.PDF)

Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.