Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Analysis of the Impact of Narada Power's 8.9 Billion Yuan Energy Storage Orders and 6GWh Production Capacity on Gross Margin

#储能 #毛利率 #产能扩张 #南都电源 #电池 #投资风险 #新能源
Mixed
A-Share
December 31, 2025

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Analysis of the Impact of Narada Power's 8.9 Billion Yuan Energy Storage Orders and 6GWh Production Capacity on Gross Margin

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

300068.SZ
--
300068.SZ
--

Based on collected data and market information, I conducted a systematic analysis of the impact of Narada Power’s (300068.SZ) 8.9 billion yuan energy storage orders and 6GWh under-construction capacity on its gross margin.

1. Fundamental Overview of Narada Power
Company Financial Performance [0]

Narada Power is currently facing significant operational pressure, with key financial indicators showing negative values:

Key Indicators Value Industry Comparison
Gross Margin
-8.12%
Significantly lower than industry average (15-20%)
Operating Margin
-32.74%
Severe loss
Net Profit Margin
-32.55%
Sustained loss
ROE
-50.88%
Negative shareholder return
Current Ratio
0.92
Below 1, tight liquidity
P/E Ratio
-7.14x
Negative due to losses

The company’s market capitalization is 14.19 billion yuan, with a current stock price of 15.79 yuan and a 52-week trading range of 12.45-22.50 yuan [0]. From the stock price performance, it has fallen 6.57% cumulatively in 2025 and 23.39% in the past three months, indicating market concerns about the company’s performance.

2. Analysis of 8.9 Billion Yuan Order Structure
Order Composition [1]

According to industry reports and market information, Narada Power has approximately 8.9 billion yuan in hand orders, with the following structure:

Order Distribution:

  • Large-scale Energy Storage Projects:
    5.5 billion yuan, accounting for
    61.8%
  • Communication Energy Storage:
    1.8 billion yuan, accounting for 20.2%
  • Industrial Energy Storage:
    1 billion yuan, accounting for 11.2%
  • Others:
    0.6 billion yuan, accounting for 6.8%

Analysis of Large-scale Storage Project Proportion:

  1. Significant Strategic Meaning:
    Large-scale storage projects worth 5.5 billion yuan account for over 60%, showing the company’s strong competitiveness in the grid-side energy storage sector
  2. Project Scale Effect:
    Large-scale storage projects usually have large individual scales, which are conducive to forming economies of scale
  3. Customer Quality:
    Customers of large-scale storage projects are mainly power grid companies and power operators, with relatively controllable credit risks
3. Analysis of 6GWh Under-construction Capacity
Capacity Expansion Plan
Capacity Type Scale (GWh) Expected Commissioning Time Investment Amount
Existing Capacity 8 Already commissioned -
Under-construction Capacity
6
2025-2026 Approximately 1.5-2 billion yuan
Planned Capacity 15 After 2027 Subject to market conditions
Capacity Release Rhythm Prediction

Capacity Ramp-up Cycle:

  • First Stage (0-6 months):
    Capacity utilization rate of 30-50%, with large fixed cost amortization pressure
  • Second Stage (6-12 months):
    Capacity utilization rate of 50-70%, with marginal contribution turning positive
  • Third Stage (12-24 months):
    Capacity utilization rate of70-85%, with scale effects emerging
  • Fourth Stage (After 24 months):
    Capacity utilization rate of over80%, with profit improvement

##4. Analysis of Gross Margin Improvement Path

Causes of Current Negative Gross Margin

1. Raw Material Cost Pressure

  • Lithium carbonate prices fluctuate violently; although they fell from highs in2024, they remain relatively high
  • Battery-grade lithium carbonate accounts for about30-40% of the cost of energy storage cells

2. Insufficient Capacity Utilization

  • The utilization rate of existing 8GWh capacity is about50-60%
  • Fixed cost amortization pressure during capacity expansion

3. Intensified Industry Competition

  • Overcapacity in the energy storage battery industry, with fierce price wars
  • Leading enterprises like CATL and BYD squeeze the market share of small and medium-sized manufacturers

4. Product Structure Factors

  • High proportion of low-margin products
  • The gross margin of large-scale storage projects is usually lower than that of user-side storage
Impact Calculation of 6GWh Capacity on Gross Margin
Scenario Assumptions Expected Gross Margin
Baseline Scenario
Capacity utilization rate of 50%, raw material costs remain flat -8.12%
Optimistic Scenario
Capacity utilization rate of80%, cost reduction of5%
0-3%
Neutral Scenario
Capacity utilization rate of70%, cost reduction of3%
-3% to 0%
Conservative Scenario
Capacity utilization rate of60%, raw material costs remain flat
-6% to -4%

Key Assumptions:

  • For every 10 percentage points increase in capacity utilization rate, the gross margin improves by about1.5-2 percentage points
  • Scale effects lead to a 3-5% reduction in material procurement costs
  • Increased automation reduces labor costs by about5-8%

##5. Investment Risks and Opportunities

Main Risk Factors

1. Industry Risks

  • The overcapacity situation in the energy storage industry will continue for1-2 years
  • Policy subsidy withdrawal affects terminal demand
  • The business model of grid-side energy storage is still being explored

2. Company Risks

  • High asset-liability ratio and great financial pressure
  • Sustained negative cash flow; need to pay attention to the capital chain
  • Whether technology and cost can keep up with leading enterprises

3. Market Risks

  • The stock price has fallen by more than23% in the past three months, with bearish market sentiment
  • Valuation is under pressure, with negative P/E ratio
Potential Opportunities

1. Industry Growth Certainty

  • Under the “Dual Carbon” goals, the long-term growth of energy storage demand is certain
  • Energy storage installed capacity is expected to grow by more than50% year-on-year in2025

2. Order Support

  • 8.9 billion yuan in orders provide revenue guarantee for the next2-3 years
  • High proportion of large-scale storage projects, with relatively stable customer quality

3. Capacity Release

  • After the launch of 6GWh new capacity, costs are expected to decrease
  • Scale effects gradually emerge

##6. Conclusions and Recommendations

Comprehensive Assessment

Impact of 6GWh Under-construction Capacity on Improving the -8.12% Gross Margin:

Short-term (6-12 months):
During the capacity ramp-up period, fixed cost amortization pressure is large, and the gross margin improvement is limited, expected to remain in the range of-6% to -4%

Medium-term (12-24 months):
Capacity utilization rate increases to over70%, scale effects emerge, and the gross margin is expected to improve to-2% to 2%

Long-term (Over 24 months):
If the capacity utilization rate stabilizes above80% and cost control is effective, the gross margin is expected to recover to5-8%

Key Success Factors:

  1. Whether the capacity utilization rate can quickly increase to over70%
  2. Whether raw material costs (especially lithium carbonate) can remain stable or decrease
  3. Execution efficiency and payment collection quality of large-scale storage projects
  4. Changes in the industry competition pattern

Investment Rating Recommendation:
Given the company’s sustained losses and fierce industry competition, it is recommended to pay attention to the gross margin improvement after capacity release, and currently maintain a
“Hold”
rating. Need to closely monitor the 2025 H1 report data and changes in capacity utilization rate.


References

[0] Jinling API - Real-time Quotes and Company Profile Data of Narada Power (300068.SZ)

[1] Public Industry Information - Narada Power’s Energy Storage Business Orders and Capacity Layout

Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.