Ginlix AI
50% OFF

Analysis of the Sustainability, Risks of High-Premium Arbitrage in Silver LOF and Application Prospects of Commodity Futures LOF

#lof_fund #arbitrage #commodity_futures #risk_assessment #investment_advice #market_analysis
Neutral
A-Share
December 29, 2025

Unlock More Features

Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

Analysis of the Sustainability, Risks of High-Premium Arbitrage in Silver LOF and Application Prospects of Commodity Futures LOF

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.

Related Stocks

161226
--
161226
--

Based on market data and analysis materials, I will systematically analyze the sustainability of high-premium arbitrage in Silver LOF, risk assessment, and application prospects of commodity futures LOF from multiple dimensions.

I. Mechanism and Case Review of High-Premium Arbitrage in Silver LOF
1.1 Analysis of Arbitrage Mechanism

The core logic of LOF fund arbitrage is to utilize the price difference between the subscription net value in the primary market and the transaction price in the secondary market. The specific operation process is:

  • Day T
    : Subscribe for fund shares at net value off-exchange
  • Day T+1
    : Confirm shares
  • Day T+2
    : Transfer shares to on-exchange and sell at market price

Profit Formula
: Arbitrage profit = On-exchange market price - Off-exchange net value - Transaction fees

1.2 Extreme Case in December 2025

According to market materials, Guotai UBS Silver Futures LOF (161226) had a rare extreme premium in December 2025:

Time Node Premium Rate Level Market Phenomenon
Late November 6.75% Premium begins to appear
December 18 39.09% Premium rises rapidly
December 23 57.5% Intraday limit up hits new high
December 24 68.3% Peak premium rate
December 25 ~45% Consecutive limit downs, premium falls back
December 26 <30% Premium further compressed [1-5]

Extreme Performance Data
:

  • Single-account subscription limit: Increased from 100 yuan to 500 yuan
  • New shares surged: From 10.97 million shares to 162.43 million shares in one week
  • Estimated arbitrage-participating accounts: At least 400,000 accounts per day on average
  • Actual arbitrage profit: Single account’s daily maximum about 300 yuan (500 yuan ×60% premium), narrowing to around 150 yuan as premium shrinks [4,5]
1.3 Risk Response Measures by Fund Company

Guotai UBS Fund in December:

  • Issued
    16 risk warning announcements
  • Implemented multiple
    intraday suspensions
    (1 hour)
  • Adjusted purchase restriction policy 4 times
    (from 100 yuan to 500 yuan)
  • Suspended subscription of Class C shares [3,6]

Shenzhen Stock Exchange implemented

key monitoring
on the fund and prompted strict identification of abnormal trading behaviors [6].


II. Sustainability Assessment of High-Premium Arbitrage
2.1 Theoretical Sustainability:
Extremely Low

Judging from financial theory and historical experience,

high-premium arbitrage is not sustainable
, for the following reasons:

(1) The arbitrage mechanism itself suppresses premiums

  • When premiums appear, arbitrage funds flood in to subscribe and sell on-exchange
  • Increased supply压低 on-exchange prices, forcing premiums to converge
  • This is exactly the market stabilization function of the arbitrage mechanism [1,3]

(2) Time difference limitation of T+2 mechanism

  • LOF arbitrage takes T+2 days to complete
  • Silver prices may fluctuate sharply within two days
  • Price declines may completely erase arbitrage space, even leading to losses [2,4]

(3) Restriction of subscription limits

  • The daily 500 yuan limit per account severely restricts arbitrage scale
  • Even
Ask based on this news for deep analysis...
Alpha Deep Research
Auto Accept Plan

Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.