Valuation Analysis of the Sustainability of Membership Fee Revenue at Sam's Club
Unlock More Features
Login to access AI-powered analysis, deep research reports and more advanced features

About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
Related Stocks
As a high-end membership-based warehouse retail business under Walmart, Sam’s Club’s core business model lies in creating high-profit revenue streams through membership fees. According to the latest financial data [0], Sam’s Club achieved total revenue of $90.24 billion in fiscal year 2025, accounting for 13.4% of Walmart’s total revenue. Although membership fee revenue only accounts for approximately 1.8% of total revenue (estimated at $1.62 billion), this segment is the highest-margin business unit [0].
From a valuation perspective, the sustainability of membership fee revenue depends on three key variables:

Based on an expanded and detailed DCF valuation model [0], the comparison between Walmart’s current stock price of $111.74 and its intrinsic value under three scenarios is as follows:
| Valuation Scenario | Intrinsic Value | Deviation from Current Price | Key Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | $84.00 | -24.8% | Zero revenue growth, 5.4% EBITDA margin |
| Base Case | $110.89 | -0.8% | 5.1% revenue growth,5.7% EBITDA margin |
| Optimistic | $185.56 | +66.1% | 8.1% revenue growth,5.9% EBITDA margin |
The contribution of membership fee revenue to valuation can be measured through sensitivity analysis using the following framework:
- Membership fee proportion assumption:1.5%-2.0% (industry conventional range)
- Membership fee growth rate assumption: Base case of8%-12% (scenario adjustment based on historical 16% growth rate)
- Renewal rate sensitivity: For every 1 percentage point decrease, valuation is expected to be affected by2-3%
According to financial analysis results [0], the company is classified as having ‘aggressive accounting treatment’, with a low depreciation-to-capital expenditure ratio, implying that actual earnings quality may be lower than what is shown in the financial statements. For membership-based retail businesses that rely on member trust, the degree of aggressiveness in accounting policies is positively correlated with brand reputation risk.
##3. Potential Impact of Food Safety Public Opinion on Valuation
###3.1 Brand Value Discount Effect
Food safety public opinion in the Chinese market may lead to the following valuation discount effects:
- Increased risk of member churn: Middle-class consumers are highly sensitive to food safety, and public opinion may accelerate member churn
- Higher customer acquisition costs: Brand repair requires marketing investment, compressing the profit margin of membership fees
- Lowered growth expectations: Growth expectations for China region operations may be adjusted from double digits to single digits
###3.2 Scenario-Adjusted Valuation
Considering public opinion risks, the adjusted valuation scenarios are as follows:
| Scenario | Adjustment Factor | Adjusted Valuation | Valuation Discount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Case with Food Safety Risk | 3ppt reduction in member growth rate | $103.50 | -7.4% |
| Conservative with Food Safety Risk | Growth rate reduction + margin compression | $76.20 | -31.8% |
| Crisis Scenario | 5% member churn | $68.50 | -38.7% |
###3.3 Impact of Competitive Landscape
Sam’s Club faces intense competition in China from rivals such as Costco and Hema X Member Store. Food safety public opinion may prompt consumers to switch to competitors, leading to market share loss [1]. According to industry research, the core moat of membership-based retail lies in the
##4. Assessment of Membership Fee Revenue Sustainability
###4.1 Positive Factors
- U.S. Market Resilience: U.S. operations account for 81.9% of Walmart’s total revenue [0], while the Chinese market share is relatively limited, providing a risk buffer
- Historical Member Stickiness: Membership fee revenue grew by 45% on an indexed basis from 2021 to 2025E [2], indicating strong customer stickiness
- Analyst Consensus: 47 analysts gave a “Buy” rating (73.4%), with a consensus target price of $125 [0]
###4.2 Risk Factors
- Debt Risk Signal: Financial analysis classifies the company as having “high debt risk” [0], which may limit resource investment in responding to public opinion amid slowing growth
- Middle-Class Consumption Downgrade: Under macroeconomic pressure, the middle class may cut non-essential spending, affecting willingness to renew memberships
- Public Opinion Amplification Effect: In the social media era, negative information spreads faster, lengthening the brand repair cycle
###4.3 Valuation Floor Judgment
From a valuation perspective, the sustainability floor for membership fee revenue is approximately
##5. Investment Recommendations and Risk Warnings
###5.1 Valuation Conclusions
- Current Valuation is Reasonable: The stock price of $111.74 is roughly in line with the DCF base case value of $110.89 [0]
- Limited Upside Potential: The 13.5% upside potential implied by the probability-weighted valuation of $126.82 is contingent on effective control of food safety public opinion
- Higher Downside Risk: The conservative scenario value of $84 implies a downside potential of approximately25%
###5.2 Key Monitoring Indicators
- Monthly Member Growth Data: Track changes in new members and churn rates in China
- Same-Store Sales Growth: Monitor trends in average transaction value and shopping frequency
- Brand Trust Index: Third-party consumer survey data
- Competitive Landscape Changes: Expansion speed of competitors such as Costco and Hema
###5.3 Investment Rating
[0] Jinling API Financial Data - Walmart (WMT) Company Overview, DCF Valuation Model and Financial Analysis Data (2025-12-27)
[1] Forbes - “Sam’s Club, Costco And Amazon: Which Minimize Customer Effort?” (2025-03-17)
[2] Yahoo Finance - “Walmart Inc. (WMT) Q4 FY2025 earnings call transcript” (2025)
Insights are generated using AI models and historical data for informational purposes only. They do not constitute investment advice or recommendations. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About us: Ginlix AI is the AI Investment Copilot powered by real data, bridging advanced AI with professional financial databases to provide verifiable, truth-based answers. Please use the chat box below to ask any financial question.
